Cited by 21Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

Aberrant cystatin‑C expression in blood from patients with breast cancer is a suitable marker for monitoring tumor burden

Open access
Kwon, Woo, Kim, Tae, Nahm, Chung, Moon, Yeonsook, Kim, Jin·2018·Oncology Letters

Abstract

The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of circulating cystatin-C as a tumor monitoring biomarker at different clinical time points in patients with breast cancer over a long-term follow-up period. In addition, the secretory rate of circulating cystatin-C from cancer tissue was investigated by comparing the blood and tissue expression levels of cystatin-C. Blood samples from healthy volunteers (40 males and 40 females) were obtained at yearly health examinations if laboratory and imaging abnormalities were not detected. Blood samples from 34 patients with breast cancer were obtained at 205 different time points of clinical progression. Blood levels of cystatin-C were measured using ELISA and the tissue levels were measured using immunohistochemistry. No age-associated effect was observed in male and female blood cystatin-C levels. The positivity rate was 46% in patients (38/83) and 40% in samples collected at different time points (82/205). Blood cystatin-C levels were lowest following surgery compared with patients with systemic metastasis (P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates of ELISA were 53.6, 63.6 and 53.9%, respectively. The concordance rate between blood and tissue expression was 38%. The main reason for discordance between tissue and serum expression of cytostatin-C came from low serum positivity in samples showing tissue cytostatin-C (3/11, 27%). The specificity between cytostatin-C and CA-125 was highest in tumor absence state. In conclusion, elevated blood levels of cystatin-C were observed in 40% of breast cancer cases and were tumor-volume dependent. However, the concordance rate between tissue and blood was quite low, suggesting tumor heterogeneity of cystatin-C expression or co-acting pathway activation, such as cathepsin D. As one-third of breast cancer tissues express cystatin-C without cancer antigen 15-3 elevation, cystatin-C may represent a good tumor-monitoring marker in breast cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3892/ol.2018.9380

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between CyC-production PGSs and reduced lifespan is consistent with evidence for elevated plasma CyC in patients with cancer.

    “and is consistent with evidence for elevated plasma CyC in patients with cancer.14”

    From Cystatin C is glucocorticoid responsive, directs recruitment of Trem2+ macrophages, and predicts failure of cancer immunotherapy (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results report higher blood cystatin-C levels in patients with breast cancer than in healthy female volunteers (P=0.034), supporting evidence of elevated circulating CyC in cancer. The paper describes blood and serum measurements, however, not a plasma measurement; its own comparison is specifically in breast cancer. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwon, W., Kim, T., Nahm, C., Moon, Y., & Kim, J.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Inha University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jin
Venue
Oncology Letters
Published
2018-09-03
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
5583-5590
ISSN
  • 1792-1074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1792-1082
OpenAlex
W2889176828
Cited by
21
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Oncology Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
cystatin C, breast cancer, circulating tumor markers, tumor burden monitoring, tumor heterogeneity, cathepsin D, CA125, metastasis, tumor volume

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review