Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revision of the West Palaearctic Polistes Latreille, with the descriptions of two species – an integrative approach using morphology and DNA barcodes (Hymenoptera, Vespidae)

Schmid-Egger, Christian, van Achterberg, Kees, Neumeyer, Rainer, Morinière, Jérôme, Schmidt, Stefan·2017·ZooKeys
DOI 10.3897/zookeys.713.11335PMC PMC5674218
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3897/zookeys.713.11335

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figures 1–12. Polistes heads in frontal view. 1 P. albellus 2 P. associus 3 P. atrimandibularis 4 P. austroccidentalis sp. n. 5 P. biglumis, 6 P. bischoffi (Switzerland) 7 P. bischoffi (France) 8 P. bucharensis (Crete) 9 P. bucharensis (Turkey) 10 P. dominula (Germany) 11 P. dominula (Hungary) 12 P. dominula (Hungary).
Figures 1–12. Polistes heads in frontal view. 1 P. albellus 2 P. associus 3 P. atrimandibularis 4 P. austroccidentalis sp. n. 5 P. biglumis, 6 P. bischoffi (Switzerland) 7 P. bischoffi (France) 8 P. bucharensis (Crete) 9 P. bucharensis (Turkey) 10 P. dominula (Germany) 11 P. dominula (Hungary) 12 P. dominula (Hungary).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figures 13–24. Polistes heads in frontal view. 13 P. foederatus (Greece) 14 P. gallicus (Spain) 15 P. gallicus (Italy) 16 P. maroccanus sp. n. 17 P. mongolicus (Greece) 18 P. mongolicus (Croatia) 19 P. mongolicus (Croatia) 20 P. nimpha (Germany), 21 P. nimpha (Turkey), 22 P. nimpha (Turkey) 23 P. nimpha (Turkey), 24 P. semenowi.
Figures 13–24. Polistes heads in frontal view. 13 P. foederatus (Greece) 14 P. gallicus (Spain) 15 P. gallicus (Italy) 16 P. maroccanus sp. n. 17 P. mongolicus (Greece) 18 P. mongolicus (Croatia) 19 P. mongolicus (Croatia) 20 P. nimpha (Germany), 21 P. nimpha (Turkey), 22 P. nimpha (Turkey) 23 P. nimpha (Turkey), 24 P. semenowi.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figures 25–32. Polistes austroccidentalis sp. n. Holotype female. 25 Mesosoma in lateral view, 26 mesosoma in dorsal view 27 metasoma in lateral view 28 metasoma in dorsal view 29 head in frontal view 30 head in dorsal view 31 head in lateral view 32 fore wing.
Figures 25–32. Polistes austroccidentalis sp. n. Holotype female. 25 Mesosoma in lateral view, 26 mesosoma in dorsal view 27 metasoma in lateral view 28 metasoma in dorsal view 29 head in frontal view 30 head in dorsal view 31 head in lateral view 32 fore wing.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figures 33–36. Polistes austroccidentalis sp. n. Holotype female. 33 Habitus, dorsal view 34 habitus lateral view 35 lower part of head in frontal view 36 gena and mandibles.
Figures 33–36. Polistes austroccidentalis sp. n. Holotype female. 33 Habitus, dorsal view 34 habitus lateral view 35 lower part of head in frontal view 36 gena and mandibles.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figures 37–45. Polistes austroccidentalis sp. n. Paratype male. 37 habitus, dorsal view, 38 mesosoma in lateral view 39 mesosoma in dorsal view 40 metasoma in ventrolateral view 41 apex of antenna 42 head in frontal view 43 head in dorsal view 44 lower part of head in frontal view 45 gena and mandibles.
Figures 37–45. Polistes austroccidentalis sp. n. Paratype male. 37 habitus, dorsal view, 38 mesosoma in lateral view 39 mesosoma in dorsal view 40 metasoma in ventrolateral view 41 apex of antenna 42 head in frontal view 43 head in dorsal view 44 lower part of head in frontal view 45 gena and mandibles.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figures 46–49. Polistes maroccanus sp. n. Holotype female. 46 habitus, lateral view 47 habitus, dorsal view 48 lower part of head in frontal view 49 head in ventral view.
Figures 46–49. Polistes maroccanus sp. n. Holotype female. 46 habitus, lateral view 47 habitus, dorsal view 48 lower part of head in frontal view 49 head in ventral view.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figures 50–56. Polistes maroccanus sp. n. Holotype female. 50 mesosoma in lateral view, 51 mesosoma in dorsal view 52 metasoma in dorsal view 53 metasoma in ventrolateral view 54 head in frontal view 55 head in dorsal view 56 head in lateral view.
Figures 50–56. Polistes maroccanus sp. n. Holotype female. 50 mesosoma in lateral view, 51 mesosoma in dorsal view 52 metasoma in dorsal view 53 metasoma in ventrolateral view 54 head in frontal view 55 head in dorsal view 56 head in lateral view.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 57. Polistes semenowi. Lectotype female, habitus, lateral aspect, and labels. Photo: K. Samartsev.
Figure 57. Polistes semenowi. Lectotype female, habitus, lateral aspect, and labels. Photo: K. Samartsev.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 58. Phylogenetic tree resulting from Bayesian analysis of COI sequence data. Number in brackets after terminal branch labels (Process ID) indicate number of haplotype sequences. Numbers on branches denote posterior probability values (omitted for branches within species).
Figure 58. Phylogenetic tree resulting from Bayesian analysis of COI sequence data. Number in brackets after terminal branch labels (Process ID) indicate number of haplotype sequences. Numbers on branches denote posterior probability values (omitted for branches within species).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Arens, 2011, Die sozialen Faltenwespen der Peloponnes (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Polistinae), mit Beschreibung einer neuen Polistes-Art und einem regionalen Polistes-Bestimmungsschlussel., Linzer biologische Beitrage, 43, 443
  2. Bluthgen, 1961, Die Faltenwespen Mitteleuropas (Hymenoptera, Diploptera)., Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse fur Chemie, Geologie und Biologie, 1961, 1
  3. 10.3752/cjai.2008.05 · DOI
  4. Buck, 2012, Unravelling cryptic species diversity in eastern Nearctic paper wasps, Polistes (Fuscopolistes), using male genitalia, morphometrics and DNA barcoding, with descriptions of two new species (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)., Zootaxa, 3502, 1, 10.11646/zootaxa.3502.1.1 · DOI
  5. 10.2307/2992359 · DOI
  6. Carpenter, 1996, Distributional checklist of species of the genus Polistes (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Polistinae, Polistini)., American Museum Novitates, 3188, 1
  7. Carpenter, 1997, Phylogenetic relationships among European Polistes and the evolution of socialparasitism (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Polistinae)., Memoires du Museum national d’Histoire naturelle, 173, 135
  8. 10.11646/zootaxa.3681.1.7 · DOI
  9. 10.1098/rspb.2007.1779 · DOI
  10. Cervo, 2006, Polistes wasps and their social parasites: an overview., Annales Zoologici Fennici, 43, 531
  11. 10.1098/rspb.1994.0090 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-1-59745-548-0_15 · DOI
  13. Diniz, 1978, As especies portuguesas de vespas (Hymenoptera Vespoidea) na coleccao do Museu e Laboratorio Zoologico da Universidade de Coimbra., Ciencias biologicas (Portugal), 4, 7
  14. Giordani Soika, 1970, Ergebnisse der zoologischen Forschungen von Dr. Z. Kazab in der Mongolei. 223. Vespidae and Eumenidae (Hymenoptera)., Annales Historico-naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, 62, 325
  15. Giordani Soika, 1976, Vespidi ed Eumenidi (Hymenoptera) raccolti in Mongolia dal Dr. Z. Kaszab., Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 22, 271
  16. Gusenleitner, 1976, Bemerkenswertes uber Faltenwespen VI., Nachrichtenblatt Bayerischer Entomologen, 25, 112
  17. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1093/beheco/4.2.128 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s00040-013-0328-0 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/BF01731581 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.3897/zookeys.400.6611 · DOI
  23. Neumeyer, 2015, New data on the distribution of Polistes bischoffi Weyrauch, 1937 and Polistes helveticus Neumeyer, 2014, a synonym of Polistes albellus Giordani Soika, 1976 n. stat. Boletin de la Sociedad Entomologica Aragonesa (S.E.A., ), 57, 205
  24. Nugroho, 2012, Checklist of vespid species occurring in Indonesian Archipelago., Treubia, 38, 71
  25. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.027 · DOI
  26. Richards, 1984a, The subgenera of Polistes Latreille (Hymenoptera, Vespidae)., Revista brasileira de Entomologia, 17, 85
  27. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 · DOI
  28. 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085432 · DOI
  29. Schmid-Egger, 1989, Die Verbreitung von Polistes bischoffi (Hym., Vespoidea) in Suddeutschland., Linzer Biologische Beitrage, 21, 601
  30. 10.1111/1755-0998.12363 · DOI
  31. 10.11646/zootaxa.3785.3.3 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s00265-007-0427-x · DOI
  33. Tischendorf, 2015, Atlas der Faltenwespen Hessens.
  34. Weyrauch, 1937, Zur Systematik und Biologie der Kuckuckswespen Pseudovespa und Pseudopolistes., Zoologische Jahrbucher (Jena), Abteilung fur Systematik, Okologie und Geographie der Tiere, 70, 243
  35. Weyrauch, 1938, Zur Systematik und Biologie der palaearktischen Polistinen., Arbeiten uber physiologische und angewandte Entomologie aus Berlin-Dahlem, 5, 273

Cited by

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Schmid-Egger, C., van Achterberg, K., Neumeyer, R., Morinière, J., & Schmidt, S.
ORCID
Schmidt, Stefan
Venue
ZooKeys
Publisher
Pensoft Publishers
Published
2017-11-02
Volume
713
Pages
53-112
ISSN
  • 1313-2970
  • 1313-2989
DOI
10.3897/zookeys.713.11335
PMC
PMC5674218
Cited by
37
References
1
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.