Cited by 2,301Environmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy

A DNA-Based Registry for All Animal Species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) System

Open access
Ratnasingham, Sujeevan, Hebert, Paul D. N.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Because many animal species are undescribed, and because the identification of known species is often difficult, interim taxonomic nomenclature has often been used in biodiversity analysis. By assigning individuals to presumptive species, called operational taxonomic units (OTUs), these systems speed investigations into the patterning of biodiversity and enable studies that would otherwise be impossible. Although OTUs have conventionally been separated through their morphological divergence, DNA-based delineations are not only feasible, but have important advantages. OTU designation can be automated, data can be readily archived, and results can be easily compared among investigations. This study exploits these attributes to develop a persistent, species-level taxonomic registry for the animal kingdom based on the analysis of patterns of nucleotide variation in the barcode region of the cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene. It begins by examining the correspondence between groups of specimens identified to a species through prior taxonomic work and those inferred from the analysis of COI sequence variation using one new (RESL) and four established (ABGD, CROP, GMYC, jMOTU) algorithms. It subsequently describes the implementation, and structural attributes of the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. Aside from a pragmatic role in biodiversity assessments, BINs will aid revisionary taxonomy by flagging possible cases of synonymy, and by collating geographical information, descriptive metadata, and images for specimens that are likely to belong to the same species, even if it is undescribed. More than 274,000 BIN web pages are now available, creating a biodiversity resource that is positioned for rapid growth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0066213

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ratnasingham, S., & Hebert, P. D. N.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Ratnasingham, Sujeevan
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-07-08
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
e66213
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072022921
Cited by
2,301
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 165 · 2025: 187 · 2024: 236 · 2023: 209 · 2022: 248 · 2021: 238 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 179 · 2018: 148 · 2017: 132 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 19
FWCI
97.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Genome Canada
  • Ontario Genomics
  • Government of Canada
  • Ontario Genomics Institute
  • Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  • Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Keywords
Barcode Index Number, DNA barcoding, COI gene, operational taxonomic units, species delimitation, animal classification, taxonomic nomenclature, undescribed species, synonymy, biodiversity assessment, ABGD, GMYC, cultivated plants
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Lepidoptera, North America, Registries, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Cluster Analysis, Databases as Topic, DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review