Cited by 8Insect Pest Control StrategiesInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of neem-derived plant protection products on the isopod species Porcellionides pruinosus (Brandt, 1833)

Open access
Doshi, Pratik, Mészárosné Póss, Anett, Tóth, Ferenc, Szalai, Mark, Turóczi, György·2018·ZooKeys

Abstract

Neem-based products have gained major attention over the last few years due to their wide range of applications in pest management, and have been in the focus of biological plant protection research in the past decade. Yet, there is limited information available to understand the side effects of these neem-derived pesticides on non-target species in soil. Therefore,Porcellionidespruinosus, a terrestrial isopod, was chosen as a non-target species to investigate such possible effects. Two different experiments were conducted to study two different neem-derived plant protection products, i.e., NeemAzal T/S (1% azadirachtin) which is a commercial product registered in the EU, and neem leaf extract from dried neem leaves (1%).The latter simulates the plant protection product, is domestically produced, and widely used by farmers in India and other tropical and subtropical countries. Findings are consistent with previous results obtained with other non-target organisms, i.e., neither of the tested neem products have adverse effects on the mortality of P.pruinosus. However, further research on a wider range of soil organisms is needed to prove the safety of neem-based products as biological control agents and to be part of integrated pest management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3897/zookeys.801.25510

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management

    Gurjar, M. S., Ali, S., Akhtar, M., & Singh, K. S. (2012) · Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.4236/as.2012.33050 · Cited by 330 · cited 1×

    “The long-term effects of indiscriminate and excessive use of synthetic pesticides induced research to develop alternative biological control strategies (Gurjar et al. 2012) which needs to be cost effective, non-toxic, biodegradable, eco-friendly (Girish and Bhat 2008).”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.18474/0749-8004-38.3.398 · DOI
  2. Akca, 2015, Efficiency of NeemAzal T/S formulation on Philosciamuscorum (Scopoli, 1763) (Isopoda: Philosciidae)., Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 25, 67
  3. 10.1007/s13593-015-0327-9 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.11.022 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/08927014.1995.9522959 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1590/S0100-204X2004001100003 · DOI
  7. Faheem, 2014, Evaluation of the toxic effect of common pesticides cypermethrin, imidacloprid and Neem (Azadirachtaindica) fruit extract, on earthworm (Pheretimaposthuma)., International Journal of Advanced Research, 2, 262
  8. Farkas, 2013, Magyarország szárazföldi ászkarák faunájának határozója (Isopoda: Oniscidea), Kaposvár., Natura Somogyiensis, 23, 89, 10.24394/NatSom.2013.23.89 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.06.007 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/096708700227516 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.04.014 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00013-9 · DOI
  13. Girish, 2008, Neem – A Green Treasure., Electronic Journal of Biology, 4, 102
  14. 10.1081/PFC-120030244 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.asd.2011.03.002 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.10.015 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/jee/83.2.629 · DOI
  18. Klemm, 1993, Effects of neem preparations on Plutellaxylostella L. and its natural enemies of the genus Trichogramma., ZeitschriftfurPflanzenkrankheiten, 100, 113
  19. 10.1139/b90-001 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.05.023 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.08.010 · DOI
  22. 2005, Ecosystem and well-being. A framework for assessment.
  23. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.09.015 · DOI
  24. Mondal, 2012, A review of efficacy of Azadirachtaindica A. Juss based biopesticides: An Indian perspective., Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 1, 94
  25. 10.1016/0022-1910(93)90001-8 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.034 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00035-3 · DOI
  28. 10.1078/0031-4056-00185 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/jee/75.6.1109 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.06.003 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s002449900398 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00058-6 · DOI
  33. Stark, 1997, Risk assessment of neem insecticides: persistence in the environment and potential impact on nontarget organisms., lst Symp. Biopesticides (Phitsanulok, Thailand, 1996) Chulalongkorn University Press, Bangkok, Thailand, 69
  34. Tangtong, 1997, Acute toxicity of neem extract on certain blood parameters of tilapia. Oreochromis niloticus., lst Symp. Biopesticides (Phitsanulok, Thailand, 1996) Chulalongkorn University Press, Bangkok, Thailand, 94
  35. 10.1007/s13355-013-0184-4 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jobaz.2015.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Warburg, 1987, Isopods and their Terrestrial Environment., Advances in Ecological Research, 17, 187, 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60246-9 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/jee/81.4.1040 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Doshi, P., Mészárosné Póss, A., Tóth, F., Szalai, M., & Turóczi, G.
Affiliations
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU)
Corresponding author
Doshi, Pratik
Venue
ZooKeys
Published
2018-12-03
Volume
801
Issue
801
Pages
415-425
ISSN
  • 1313-2970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1313-2989
OpenAlex
W2902292544
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ZooKeys (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Tempus Közalapítvány
  • Szent István Egyetem
  • Magyarország Kormánya
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
Porcellionides pruinosus, terrestrial isopods, non-target effects, azadirachtin, neem leaf extract, biological control, integrated pest management, soil organisms, ecotoxicity, NeemAzal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review