Cited by 9Animal Behavior and ReproductionCrustacean biology and ecologyPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Offspring growth and survivorship in the woodlouse Porcellionides pruinosus

Dangerfield, J.M., Telford, S.R.·1995·Ethology Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Offspring from two groups of female Porcellionides pruinosus (Brandt), a synanthropic woodlouse, were reared individually under laboratory conditions of excess food and constant temperature. Birth weight, which varied both within and between broods, affected survivorship but was not significantly correlated with offspring growth. In both groups offspring size at 101 days was independent of birth weight and there was only a weak relationship between birth weight and offspring survivorship. Analysis of survivorship for offspring in size classes suggested a minimum size threshold for survival, below which few offspring were produced. This size threshold and a strong correlation between fertility and female fitness indicates possible stabilizing selection on offspring size in these animals. Significant intraspecific variation in offspring size would thus be a rapid, potentially adaptive, phenotypic response to environmental conditions where minimum investment requirements to ensure offspring survival are maintained.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08927014.1995.9522959

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.2307/4031 · DOI
  2. Atkinson, D. Information, non-genetic constraints and the testing of theories of life history variation. Symposia of the British Ecological Society. Behavioral ecology: ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour, Edited by: Sibly, R. M. and Smith, R. H. pp.99–104. Oxford: Blackwell. 25
  3. 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90137-M · DOI
  4. 10.1086/283037 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF00379089 · DOI
  6. Caswell H., 1983, American Zoologist, 23, 35, 10.1093/icb/23.1.35 · DOI
  7. Caswell, H. Life-history strategies. Symposia of the British Ecological Society. Ecological concepts: the contribution of ecology to an understanding of the natural world, Edited by: Cherret, J. M. pp.285–307. Oxford: Blackwell. 29
  8. Dangerfield J. M., 1987, Variation in the life history and population parameters of Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille)
  9. 10.1007/BF00319026 · DOI
  10. Hoese, B. The marsupium in terrestrial isopods. Symposium Zoological Society of London. The biology of terrestrial isopods, Edited by: Sutton, S. L. and Holdiich, D. pp.65–76. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 53
  11. Hoese B., 1989, Monitore Zoologico Italiano (Nuova Serie) Monografia, 4, 153
  12. Hubbell S. P., 1971, Systems analysis and simulation in ecology, 269, 10.1016/B978-0-12-547201-2.50012-1 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/1938739 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/2407817 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/1935043 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1086/284676 · DOI
  17. 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002455 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/1948475 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/1931979 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF00325268 · DOI
  21. 10.1086/282929 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/3887 · DOI
  23. Sutton, S. L., Hassall, M., Willows, R., Davis, R. C., Grundy, A. and Sunderland, K. D. Life histories of terrestrial isopods. Symposium Zoological Society of London. The biology of terrestrial isopods, Edited by: Sutton, S. L. and Holdiich, D. pp.269–294. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 53
  24. 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60246-9 · DOI
  25. Willows, R. I. Breeding phenology of woodlice and oostegite development inLigia oceanica(L.) (Crustacea). Symposium Zoological Society of London. The biology of terrestrial isopods, Edited by: Sutton, S. L. and Holdiich, D. pp.469–485. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 53
  26. 10.2307/4817 · DOI
  27. 10.2307/4818 · DOI
  28. 10.1086/284667 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Dangerfield, J. M., & Telford, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
Venue
Ethology Ecology & Evolution
Published
1995-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
97-105
ISSN
  • 0394-9370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1828-7131
OpenAlex
W1969594116
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2018: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethology Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
Porcellionides pruinosus, woodlouse, offspring growth, offspring survival, birth weight, threshold size, stabilizing selection, intraspecific variation, fertility, female fitness, phenotypic plasticity, size-dependent survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review