CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesFeminism, Gender, and IntersectionalityPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Woke? Affect, Neoliberalism, Marginalised Identities and Consumer Culture

Kanai, Akane, Gill, Rosalind·2020·New Formations
DOI 10.3898/newf:102.01.2020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Reading the current conjuncture is challenging. Alongside the exigencies of the current global pandemic, we live in a moment of resurgence of right-wing nationalism, populism, and a crisis of the left across the West. At the same time, we observe a different kind of political commonsense emerging in consumer culture. From burger chains and oil companies to fast fashion, there is an increasing saturation of 'feel good' and 'positive' messages of female empowerment, LGBTIQ pride, racial and religious diversity and inclusion, and environmental awareness. In this article, we question how radical politics – especially around gender, race and sexuality – is put to work in current moment as a response to crisis/ crises in this context of corporate 'wokeness'. We analyse the texture of woke capitalism – what it re-articulates and disarticulates – using Stuart Hall's ideas of conjuncture but contribute an explicitly feminist perspective that notes the extent to which these ideological formations operate affectively . We draw on contemporary feminist work illustrating the affective operation of neoliberalism in the production of everyday life and subjectivity. Going beyond a simple diagnosis of incorporation and recuperation of radical movements, we use the case study of woke capitalism to suggest the production of new affective movements structuring the ongoing obduracy of neoliberalism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3898/newf:102.01.2020

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kanai, A., & Gill, R.
Affiliations
City, University of London (GB)
ORCID
Venue
New Formations
Publisher
Lawrence and Wishart
Published
2020-12-01
Volume
102
Issue
102
Pages
10-27
ISSN
0950-2378 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3898/newf:102.01.2020
OpenAlex
W3097676871
Cited by
122
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 10
FWCI
20.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New Formations (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Keywords
neoliberalism, affect, consumerism, marginalized identities, gender, race, sexuality, feminist theory, Stuart Hall, conjuncture, radical movements, subjectivity, everyday life, right-wing populism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review