Cited by 34Psychometric Methodologies and TestingRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Patient Perspective: Choosing or Developing Instruments

Open access
KIRWAN, JOHN R., FRIES, JAMES F., HEWLETT, SARAH, OSBORNE, RICHARD H.·2011·The Journal of Rheumatology

Abstract

Previous Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) meetings recognized that patients view outcomes of intervention from a different perspective. This preconference position paper briefly sets out 2 patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument approaches, the PROMISE computer adaptive testing (CAT) system and development of a rheumatoid arthritis-specific questionnaire to measure fatigue; a tentative proposal for a PRO instrument development pathway is also made.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3899/jrheum.110390

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient involvement is not only recommended by many researchers, it has also become a requirement if the PROM is used in medical product development.

    “This is especially surprising because patient involvement is not only recommended by many researchers,5, 6, 7, 8, 9 a few years ago it has also become a requirement if the PROM is used in medical product development.26”

    From Patient involvement in the development of patient‐reported outcome measures: a scoping review (2017) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Abstract (page not provided) says the FDA recently issued guidelines for choosing, developing, or justifying patient-reported outcome instruments. The section “A Methodological Proposal for Developing or Choosing Instruments (Questionnaires)” says questionnaire development should include consultation with patients, but the paper does not say patient involvement became a requirement for PROMs used in medical product development. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • To capture the patient's perspective, it is essential that patients are involved in PROM development.

    “To capture the patient's perspective, it is essential that patients are involved in PROM development”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nicklin J. The development of scales to measure fatigue in people with rheumatoid arthritis [PhD dissertation]. Bristol, UK: University of West of England; 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KIRWAN, J. R., FRIES, J. F., HEWLETT, S., & OSBORNE, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Bristol Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Venue
The Journal of Rheumatology
Published
2011-08
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1716-1719
ISSN
  • 0315-162X (ISSN-L)
  • 1499-2752
OpenAlex
W1982865546
Cited by
34
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
patient-reported outcome measures, rheumatoid arthritis, fatigue, promise, computerized adaptive testing, outcome measure development, patient perspectives, OMERACT, questionnaire development
MeSH terms
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Congresses as Topic, Fatigue, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rheumatology, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review