Cited by 58Radar Systems and Signal ProcessingRadio Wave Propagation StudiesOcean Waves and Remote Sensing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of high frequency surface wave radar for detection and tracking of ships

Open access
PONSFORD, TONY, WANG, JIAN·2010·Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

Abstract

In today's resource-driven economy, maritime nations are claiming economic borders that extend beyond the continental shelf or the 200 nautical mile (nm) Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). However, claiming such large economic area places responsibilities on the parent nation to exercise jurisdiction through surveillance and enforcement. The requirement to see beyond the horizon has long been a goal of maritime security forces. Today, this is largely dependent on cooperative vessels voluntarily communicating their intentions to local shore-side authorities, as well as on those vessel sightings reported by patrollers. Recent advances in technology provide maritime nations with options to provide more systematic surveillance of both cooperative and non-cooperative targets. This paper presents an overview of a land-based High Frequency Surface Wave Radar (HFSWR) used to provide persistent, active, surveillance. The paper demonstrates that these radars have now reached a level of maturity where their performance is predictable and that they can, within known limits, reliably detect and track ocean going vessels throughout the EEZ.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3906/elk-0912-331

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An emerging approach to MTT and information fusion, based on a factor graph and the sum-product algorithm (SPA), has flexibility, low complexity and useful scalability.

    “An emerging approach to MTT and information fusion - one with flexibility, low complexity and useful scalability - is based on a factor graph and the sum-product algorithm (SPA) [38], [39], [49].”

    From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [49]

    Section 8.1 describes vessel tracking by associating detections near predicted positions, but does not discuss a factor graph or the sum-product algorithm. Searches for those terms and for the claimed flexibility, low complexity, and scalability found no passage addressing this approach. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The complexity of existing MTT algorithms usually does not scale well in relevant system parameters, e.g., the number of sensors.

    “And third, their complexity usually does not scale well in relevant system parameters, e.g., the number of sensors.”

    From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [47]

    Section 8.1 describes how the tracker associates detections and manages tracks, but does not discuss computational complexity. Searches for MTT algorithm complexity and scaling with the number of sensors found no passage addressing that claim; Section 8 discusses detector efficiency, not tracker scalability. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing MTT algorithms do not adapt to time-varying model parameters.

    “Second, they do not adapt to time-varying model parameters.”

    From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [47]

    Section 8.1 describes a ship tracker’s predicted positions, motion constraints, and updates, but does not say whether existing MTT algorithms adapt to time-varying model parameters. Searches for that phrase and for changing target dynamics found no passage addressing the claimed limitation; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The fusion of heterogeneous information sources in existing MTT algorithms is not straightforward.

    “First, the fusion of heterogeneous information sources is not straightforward.”

    From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [47]

    Section 8.1 describes associating radar detections into vessel tracks, while Section 5.3 discusses a trade-off in Doppler processing. Neither addresses the difficulty of fusing heterogeneous information sources in MTT algorithms. Searches for “heterogeneous,” “fusion,” and multi-target tracking across different sources found no passage making that point. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. L. Sevgi, A. Ponsford, A. Chan, "An integrated maritime surveillance system based on high frequency surface wave radars, Part 1 -Theory of operation", IEEE Proc. Ant. And Prop., Vol. 43, Aug. 2001.
  2. A. M. Ponsford, "Detection and tracking of go-fast boats using HFSWR", SPIE Defence and Security Symposium, Orlando ,17 April 2004.
  3. C. W. Trueman, S. J. Kubina, "RCS of fundamental scatterers in the HF band", 7 th Annual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics of the Applied Electromagnetics Computational Society, Monterey, California, March 18-22, 1991.
  4. H. Leong, H. Wilson, "An estimation and verification of vessel radar cross sections for HFSWR", IEEE Ant and Prop Mag, Vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 11-6, Apr. 2006.
  5. H. Leong, A. Ponsford, "The advantage of dual-frequency operation in ship tracking by HF surface wave radar", International Radar Conference 2004, Toulouse, France, 19-21 Oct. 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
PONSFORD, T., & WANG, J.
Venue
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
Published
2010-01-01
ISSN
  • 1300-0632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1303-6203
OpenAlex
W2105912452
Cited by
58
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES (publishedVersion)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Radio Wave Propagation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Keywords
high frequency surface wave radar, ship detection, vessel tracking, maritime surveillance, maritime security, exclusive economic zone, non-cooperative targets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review