Cited by 5Spine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAnesthesia and Pain Management

The effect of tramadol and tramadol + gabapentin combination in patients with lumbar disc herniation after epidural steroid injection

Open access
PİRBUDAK, Lütfiye, ÇİÇEK, Hülya, IŞIK, Mustafa, ZER, Yasemin·2015·TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the effects of tramadol-only treatment and tramadol + gabapentin treatment in patients who had received an epidural steroid injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with hernia disc-originated acute lumbar discogenic pain were evaluated. All patients received a single dose of steroid and local anesthesia mixture epidurally via the lumbar approach. In both groups, Group T (tramadol, n = 20) and Group TG (tramadol + gabapentin, n = 20), the injection dose was adjusted to 4 mL of triamcinolone acetonide and 0.25% bupivacaine mixture. Orally, 75 mg/day tramadol or 75 mg/day tramadol + 900 mg/day gabapentin were added to the treatment. Leukocyte, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and urine serotonin levels were measured prior to and after treatment. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated byvisual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and straight leg elevation test (SLET). RESULTS: Similar improvements in VAS, ODI, and SLET values were observed in both groups in the second week. The inflammation markers were not different after treatment, neither within the groups nor between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that tramadol + gabapentin treatment was not superior to tramadol treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3906/sag-1310-2

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PİRBUDAK, L., ÇİÇEK, H., IŞIK, M., & ZER, Y.
Venue
TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Published
2015
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1214-1219
ISSN
  • 1300-0144 (ISSN-L)
  • 1303-6165
OpenAlex
W2291237144
Cited by
5
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
lumbar disc herniation, epidural steroid injection, tramadol, gabapentin, analgesic combination, acute low back pain, triamcinolone acetonide, bupivacaine, inflammatory markers, urinary serotonin, Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale
MeSH terms
Gabapentin, Administration, Oral, Adult, Amines, Analgesics, Anesthetics, Local, Bupivacaine, Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids, Disability Evaluation, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Injections, Epidural, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Lumbar Vertebrae, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Tramadol, Triamcinolone Acetonide, Single-Blind Method, Low Back Pain, Visual Analog Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review