The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quand les hommes inventèrent l'avenir
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From this point of view, he suggested something similar to what has been set out by some recent scholars such as Gärdenfors (2003), Osvath and Gärdenfors (2005), and Spelke (1990;2000).”
From Trần Đức Thảo: A Marxist Theory of the Origins of Human Language (2016) · cites this paper as Osvath and Gärdenfors (2005)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trần Đức Thảo: A Marxist Theory of the Origins of Human Language
D'Alonzo, J. (2016) · Theoria et Historia Scientiarum · doi:10.12775/ths.2016.007 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Osvath, M., & Gärdenfors, P.
- Venue
- Les Grands Dossiers des Sciences Humaines
- Publisher
- CAIRN
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- N°1
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 14-14
- ISSN
- 1777-375X
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
