Cited by 17Ethics and Social Impacts of AIFoucault, Power, and EthicsDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

Le nouveau pouvoir statistique: Ou quand le contrôle s'exerce sur un réel normé, docile et sans événement car constitué de corps « numériques »...

Open access
Rouvroy, Antoinette, Berns, Thomas·2010·Multitudes

Abstract

Résumé Dans ce texte, Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns décrivent le métabolisme normatif qui s’impose dans les pratiques statistiques contemporaines, de la digitalisation de la vie au profilage. Comment cela produit un nouveau type de norme ? Comment cela gouverne ? Quel type de sujet cela gouverne et cela produit ? Quel rapport les normes entretiennent-elles aux comportements ? Quel usage du droit envisager face à ces normativités rivales ?

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3917/mult.040.0088

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rouvroy, A., & Berns, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Namur (BE)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Venue
Multitudes
Publisher
CAIRN
Published
2010-02-23
Volume
n° 40
Issue
1
Pages
88-103
ISSN
0292-0107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1614197112
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Multitudes (publishedVersion)
  • Multitudes
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
statistical power, normativity, digitalization of life, profiling, governance, subject, behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review