The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accompagner et prévenir. Tensions éthiques dans le dépistage du cancer colorectal
Open accessAbstract
Cet article présente les résultats d’une enquête concernant l’éthique de la prévention. Elle a été réalisée au sein d’une recherche interventionnelle en santé des populations, mobilisant des médiateurs (navigateurs) pour corriger les inégalités de participation au dépistage organisé du cancer colorectal dans 5 départements français. Quatre tensions éthiques émergent sur le terrain : à propos de l’incertitude du test, de l’organisation des campagnes, de l’intrusion dans la vie privée et de l’universalisme proportionné. Ces tensions sont décrites à partir d’une enquête ancrée dans une approche pragmatiste, attentive aux épreuves que vivent les acteurs de la prévention, intégrant dans un même mouvement l’investigation sur les faits et la réflexion sur les valeurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIRTH OF THE EMPIRICAL TURN IN BIOETHICS
Borry, P., Schotsmans, P. T., & Dierickx, K. (2005) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00424.x · Cited by 261
A Relational Account of Public Health Ethics
Baylis, F. E., C, N. P. K. O., & Sherwin, S. (2008) · Public Health Ethics · doi:10.1093/phe/phn025 · Cited by 244
Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints?
Skrabanek, P. (1990) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.16.4.187 · Cited by 114
SYMBIOTIC EMPIRICAL ETHICS: A PRACTICAL METHODOLOGY
Frith, L. (2010) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01843.x · Cited by 99
Patient Navigation: Development of a Protocol for Describing What Navigators Do
Parker, V. A., Clark, J. A., Leyson, J., Calhoun, E. A., Carroll, J. K., Freund, K. M., & Battaglia, T. A. (2010) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01079.x · Cited by 85
Potter, M. B. (2013) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114436 · Cited by 32
Knight, R. (2015) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1363459315583156 · Cited by 15
Cited by
Theoretical and practical challenges of proportionate universalism: a review
Francis-Oliviero, F., Cambon, L., Wittwer, J., Marmot, M., & Alla, F. (2020) · Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública · doi:10.26633/rpsp.2020.110 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Lechopier, N., & Hamant, C.
- Affiliations
- Institut supérieur d'étude des religions et de la laïcité (FR)
- Venue
- Sciences sociales et santé
- Publisher
- CAIRN
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 5
- ISSN
- 0294-0337 (ISSN-L)
- 1777-5914
- OpenAlex
- W2777052667
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sciences sociales et santé (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ligue Contre le Cancer
- Institut Français
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- colorectal cancer screening, organized screening programs, ethics of prevention, health navigators, health disparities, screening uptake, test uncertainty, privacy, screening campaign, pragmatic ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review