Cited by 9Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionEthics and bioethics in healthcareGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accompagner et prévenir. Tensions éthiques dans le dépistage du cancer colorectal

Open access
Lechopier, Nicolas, Hamant, Chloé·2017·Sciences sociales et santé

Abstract

Cet article présente les résultats d’une enquête concernant l’éthique de la prévention. Elle a été réalisée au sein d’une recherche interventionnelle en santé des populations, mobilisant des médiateurs (navigateurs) pour corriger les inégalités de participation au dépistage organisé du cancer colorectal dans 5 départements français. Quatre tensions éthiques émergent sur le terrain : à propos de l’incertitude du test, de l’organisation des campagnes, de l’intrusion dans la vie privée et de l’universalisme proportionné. Ces tensions sont décrites à partir d’une enquête ancrée dans une approche pragmatiste, attentive aux épreuves que vivent les acteurs de la prévention, intégrant dans un même mouvement l’investigation sur les faits et la réflexion sur les valeurs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3917/sss.354.0005

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Lechopier, N., & Hamant, C.
Affiliations
Institut supérieur d'étude des religions et de la laïcité (FR)
Venue
Sciences sociales et santé
Publisher
CAIRN
Published
2017
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
5
ISSN
  • 0294-0337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1777-5914
OpenAlex
W2777052667
Cited by
9
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Sciences sociales et santé (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer
  • Institut Français
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
colorectal cancer screening, organized screening programs, ethics of prevention, health navigators, health disparities, screening uptake, test uncertainty, privacy, screening campaign, pragmatic ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review