The DOI matches its Crossref record.
probabilistic robotics
Abstract
Field Robot Event is an annual competition for small field robots intended for student teams. Field Robot project has been seen as a motivating challenge for project-based learning as it results to a working prototype. In Finland the team has been a joint team with students from different institutions and interdisciplinary educational goals have been set: (1) to let students apply theoretical knowledge in practice; (2) to teach team working skills; and (3) to get acquainted with robot design. This requires well planned student guiding and teaching. Dividing the team in separate groups makes schedule keeping hard, decreases working motivation and hinders learning from each other. A better division has been found to spend the autumn term for catching up knowledge gaps in separate groups and then integrating the team in the spring term. Dividing education in consequent work tasks enables schedule follow-up and learning evaluation. Too much freedom leads to less learning and a decreased work motivation. Detailed robot specifications have enabled the students to focus on the essential work. This, in addition to considering the teachers as clients ordering a working end product, but on the other hand as hands-on teachers in individual problems, was proven successful as the team won the FRE 2008 competition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence
Ghahramani, Z. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14541 · Cited by 1,995
Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR
Zhou, F., Duh, H. B.-L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008) · 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1109/ismar.2008.4637362 · Cited by 1,121
Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Survey of Current Trends in Autonomous Driving
Bresson, G., Alsayed, Z., Yu, L., & Glaser, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2017.2749181 · Cited by 885
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Neural RRT*: Learning-Based Optimal Path Planning
Wang, J., Chi, W., Li, C., Wang, C., & Meng, M. Q.-H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2020.2976560 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Oksanen, T., Tiusanen, J., & Kostamo, J.
- Venue
- Precision agriculture '09
- Publisher
- Brill | Wageningen Academic
- Published
- 2009-10-30
- Pages
- 849-856
- OpenAlex
- W4388475847
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.42
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: probabilistic robotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3920/9789086866649_102
- The paper
- Oksanen, T., Tiusanen, J., & Kostamo, J. (2009). probabilistic robotics. Precision agriculture '09. https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086866649_102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.