Cited by 44Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthReproductive tract infections research

Is there a role for modified probiotics as beneficial microbes: a systematic review of the literature

Zorzela, L., Ardestani, S.K., McFarland, L.V., Vohra, S.·2017·Beneficial Microbes

Abstract

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of modified (heat-killed or sonicated) probiotics for the efficacy and safety to prevent and treat various diseases. Recent clinical research has focused on living strains of probiotics, but use in high-risk patients and potential adverse reactions including bacteremia has focused interest on alternatives to the use of live probiotics. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Alt Health Watch, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, from inception to February 14, 2017 for randomised controlled trials involving modified probiotic strains. The primary outcome was efficacy to prevent or treat disease and the secondary outcome was incidence of adverse events. A total of 40 trials were included (n=3,913): 14 trials (15 arms with modified probiotics and 20 control arms) for the prevention of diseases and 26 trials (29 arms with modified probiotics and 32 control arms) for treatment of various diseases. Modified microbes were compared to either placebo (44%), or the same living probiotic strain (39%) or to only standard therapies (17%). Modified microbes were not significantly more or less effective than the living probiotic in 86% of the preventive trials and 69% of the treatment trials. Modified probiotic strains were significantly more effective in 15% of the treatment trials. Incidence rates of adverse events were similar for modified and living probiotics and other control groups, but many trials did not collect adequate safety data. Although several types of modified probiotics showed significant efficacy over living strains of probiotics, firm conclusions could not be reached due to the limited number of trials using the same type of modified microbe (strain, daily dose and duration) for a specific disease indication. Further research may illuminate other strains of modified probiotics that may have potential as clinical biotherapeutics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3920/bm2017.0032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Canada, probiotics have two modes of sale on the market, Natural and Non-Prescription Health Products Directorate (NNHPD) and Food Directorate.

    “In Canada, probiotics have two modes of sale on the market, Natural and Non-Prescription Health Products Directorate (NNHPD) and Food Directorate [3, 228].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 44

Authors
Zorzela, L., Ardestani, S. K., McFarland, L. V., & Vohra, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Washington Medical Center (US)
Venue
Beneficial Microbes
Published
2017-10-13
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
739-754
ISSN
  • 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-2891
OpenAlex
W2753844555
Cited by
44
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
heat-killed probiotics, probiotic efficacy, probiotic safety, adverse events, disease prevention, disease treatment, bacteremia, biologic therapy
MeSH terms
Humans, Placebos, Incidence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review