Cited by 54Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Bacillus clausii UBBC-07 reduces severity of diarrhoea in children under 5 years of age: a double blind placebo controlled study

Sudha, M. Ratna, Jayanthi, N., Pandey, D.C., Verma, A.K.·2019·Beneficial Microbes

Abstract

Acute diarrhoea is one of the leading causes of mortality in infants and young children. Evidence suggests that probiotics can reduce diarrhoea duration. As the effects of probiotics are strain specific, the effect of Bacillus clausii UBBC-07, a safe probiotic strain in the treatment of acute diarrhoea in children was studied. The double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel group multicentric study was conducted at two outpatient facility sites in Lucknow, India. Children aged six months to five years suffering from acute diarrhoea, were randomly assigned to receive either probiotic ( B. clausii UBBC-07) spore suspension or placebo suspension twice daily apart from oral rehydration solution (ORS). The duration of treatment was for five days with a follow -up until the 10 th day. Outcomes evaluated were duration and frequency of diarrhoea, consistency of stool, fever and vomiting. The duration of diarrhoea was significantly shorter ( P <0.05) in patients who received B. clausii suspension (75.66±13.23 h) than in placebo treated group (81.6±15.43 h). The average daily number of stools (frequency) was 8.67±3.42 at baseline in treatment group receiving B. clausii and 8.53±3.19 in placebo group. By day 4, there was a significant reduction ( P <0.01) in frequency of stools in probiotic treated group (3.46±0.66) as compared to placebo group (4.57±1.59). Improvement in stool consistency was also observed in the probiotic treated group as compared to the placebo group. There was no effect on vomiting and duration of fever. B. clausii UBBC-07 significantly decreased the duration and frequency of diarrhoea as compared to placebo indicating effectiveness of strain in the treatment of acute diarrhoea in children and could be a safe alternative to antibiotics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3920/bm2018.0094

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sudha, M. R., Jayanthi, N., Pandey, D. C., & Verma, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Research & Development, Unique Biotech Ltd., Plot No. 2, Phase-II, Alexandria Knowledge Park, Hyderabad, Telangana 500078, India.
  • M.V. Hospital and Research Centre (IN)
  • K.R.M. hospital and Research Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Room No 01 3/92-93,Vijayant Khand Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Venue
Beneficial Microbes
Published
2019-03-13
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
149-154
ISSN
  • 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-2891
OpenAlex
W2908780846
Cited by
53
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Keywords
probiotics, acute diarrhea, childhood diarrhea, diarrhea duration, stool consistency, oral rehydration solution, infants and young children, antibiotic alternatives
MeSH terms
Bacillus clausii, Child, Preschool, Diarrhea, Double-Blind Method, Feces, Female, Humans, India, Infant, Male, Placebos, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review