Non-Conventional Method for Evaluation and Optimization of Medium Components for Rapamycin Production by Streptomyces hygroscopicus
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kinetic studies of growth and rapamycin production by S. hygroscopicus have not been satisfactorily done.
“In the literature, although there are many reports describing optimization of the media (Refaat and Abdel-Fatah 2008) and improvement of strain for better production of rapamycin (Xu et al. 2005; Jung et al. 2011), kinetic studies of growth and rapamycin production by S. hygroscopicus have not been satisfactorily done yet.”
From Kinetics of rapamycin production by Streptomyces hygroscopicus MTCC 4003 (2014) · cites this paper as Refaat and Abdel-Fatah 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Abdel-Fattah, Y. R.
- Corresponding author
- Abdel-Fattah, Yasser Refaat
- Venue
- Research Journal of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Science Alert
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 405-413
- ISSN
- 1816-4935 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976431764
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
- Keywords
- Streptomyces hygroscopicus, culture medium optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
