Using technology acceptance model to measure the ese of social media for collaborative learning in Ghana
Open accessAbstract
In this Digital era, thousands of teens in the universities use social network sites, it has become a way of life. Social Media Usage has recently received numerous debate in its impact on academics, with its advent, communities have become link to each other, but the lecture room still remains quite isolated, from other teachers, students, and a host of others who could potentially enhance learning. This study aimed at investigating the impact of social media usage on students’ academic performance through collaborative learning among university students in Ghana. (Based Davis et al,. 1989) Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), a conceptual framework was adopted for the study. To achieve the objectives, a quantitative data analysis method was employed. A total of 200 students were randomly surveyed for the study. Regression analysis revealed that, Interaction with peers, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness had a significant positive relationship with collaborative learning. Furthermore, results suggested that there exist a significant mediation effects on the relationship between social media usage dimensions and academic performance. TAM does not take into account environment or economic factors that may influence a person’s intention to perform a behavior. The study recommends a clear mobile learning methodologies, rules and policies for integrating student activities on social media into their final grades.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Users are more likely to adopt and continue using social media when they believe it enhances their academic or professional performance, and when the platforms are easy to use, and when there is encouragement from institutions, along with adequate infrastructural support, further strengthens adoption and sustained engagement.
“Users are more likely to adopt and continue using social media when they believe it enhances their academic or professional performance, and when the platforms are easy to use, and when there is encouragement from institutions, along with adequate infrastructural support, further strengthens adoption and sustained engagement (Abbad, 2021;Alhussain, 2020;Amadu et al., 2018;Athukorala, 2018;Aydoğmuş”
From Effect of Social Media on Institutional Performance in the Nepalese Higher Education Institutions: A Qualitative Analysis Using the Extended UTAUT Model (2026) · cites this paper as Amadu et al., 2018
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Facebook and academic performance
Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024 · Cited by 1,578 · see citing works
Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004 · Cited by 1,260 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of social networking online and social capital
Liu, D., Ainsworth, S. E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2016) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000091 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Social networking online and personality of self-worth: a meta-analysis
Liu, D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2016) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.024 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Using Facebook for teaching and learning: A review of the literature
Yang, Y., Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., & Quek, C. L. (2011) · International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning · doi:10.1504/ijceell.2011.039695 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Gray, K., Chang, S., & Kennedy, G. (2010) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/14759390903579208 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sah, G. K., Aryal, B. R., & Shrestha, S. K. (2026) · Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.3126/njmr.v9i2.93075
- Authors
- Amadu, L., Syed Muhammad, S., Mohammed, A. S., Owusu, G., & Lukman, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- Journal of Technology and Science Education
- Publisher
- Omnia Publisher SL
- Published
- 2018-07-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321
- ISSN
- 2013-6374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2835931529
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Technology and Science Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion)
- Greater South Information System
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- social media use, cooperative learning, technology acceptance model, academic performance, university students, peer interaction, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, mobile learning, Ghana
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review