Smart carpet: developing a sensor system to detect falls and summon assistance
Abstract
Cognitive deficits experienced by older adults with dementia limit use of wearable devices (necklaces or bracelets) that summon assistance after the older adult falls. To use these wearable devices, older adults must choose to wear them, remember how to use them, and be conscious after falling. Devices such as the Smart Carpet substitute pre-programmed or automatic functions for functions requiring deliberation and decision. After development of a Smart Carpet prototype, 11 volunteers participated in tests to measure sensitivity of sensors embedded in the Smart Carpet. The embedded sensors were not perceptible to the volunteers as they walked across the Smart Carpet and successfully detected gait characteristics. Findings confirmed the feasibility of fall detection. Measurements obtained of gait characteristics will be used in development of more advanced versions of the Smart Carpet.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among non-wearable systems, cameras, motion sensors, microphones and floor sensors have been applied to fall monitoring and prevention.
“Among non-wearable systems cameras, motion sensors, microphones and floor sensors have been applied to this aim (280, 281).”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [280]
Cites
Balance Performance and Step Width in Noninstitutionalized, Elderly, Female Fallers and Nonfallers
Heitmann, D., Gossman, M. R., Shaddeau, S. A., & Jackson, J. R. (1989) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/69.11.923 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Wearing and Using Personal Emergency
Porter, E. J. (2005) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/0098-9134-20051001-07 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
A Clinical Method of Quantitative Gait Analysis
Cerny, K. (1983) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/63.7.1125 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Signal scavenging for passive monitoring in eldercare technology
Tyrer, H. W., Neelgund, R. V., Mohammed, A., et al. (2009) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2009.5334497 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation(2003) · PubMed
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zucchella, C., Sinforiani, E., Tamburin, S., Federico, A., Mantovani, E., Bernini, S., Casale, R., & Bartolo, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.01058 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
“Among non-wearable systems cameras, motion sensors, microphones and floor sensors have been applied to this aim (280, 281).”
MethodFall Detection Devices and Their Use With Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Chaudhuri, S., Thompson, H., & Demiris, G. (2014) · Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy · doi:10.1519/jpt.0b013e3182abe779 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aud, M. A., Abbott, C. C., Tyrer, H. W., Neelgund, R. V., Shriniwar, U. G., Mohammed, A., & Devarakonda, K. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Gerontological Nursing
- Publisher
- SLACK, Inc.
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 8-12
- ISSN
- 0098-9134 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-243X
- OpenAlex
- W160636370
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Gerontological Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Keywords
- fall detection, dementia, older adults, wearable devices, embedded sensors, gait parameters, assistive technology, cognitive impairment
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Adult, Aged, Dementia, Equipment Design, Feasibility Studies, Floors and Floorcoverings, Gait, Humans, Middle Aged, Telemetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review