The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Judgment Development: Using Simulation to Create an Assessment Rubric
Abstract
Clinical judgment is a skill every nurse needs, but nurse educators sometimes struggle with how to present it to students and assess it. This article describes an exploratory study that originated and pilot tested a rubric in the simulation laboratory to describe the development of clinical judgment, based on Tanner's Clinical Judgment Model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Creswell, J. W. (1994) · Cited by 35,204
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Morgan, D. (1997) · doi:10.4135/9781412984287 · Cited by 8,863
(1987) · Cited by 6,910
How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process
Bugg, E. G., & Dewey, J. (1934) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415632 · Cited by 5,350
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966
Thinking Like a Nurse: A Research-Based Model of Clinical Judgment in Nursing
Tanner, C. A. (2006) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20060601-04 · Cited by 1,735
Designing qualitative research, 3rd ed.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999) · Cited by 1,549
Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, Clinical Judgment and Ethics
Benner, P., Tanner, C., & Chesla, C. A. (1996) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,007
Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context
Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079812331380384 · Cited by 980 · cited 1×
“Others later concurred (Boud, 1999; Boud & Walker, 1998), allowing that reflection gives learners the opportunity to sort out their learning through an exploratory process.”
Background
Cited by
Clinical judgment: The last frontier for evaluation
Lasater, K. (2011) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013 · Cited by 179
Self-citationLavoie, P., Michaud, C., Bélisle, M., Boyer, L., Gosselin, É., Grondin, M., Larue, C., Lavoie, S., & Pepin, J. (2018) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13416 · Cited by 152
Learning Through Debriefing: Students' Perspectives
Fey, M. K., Scrandis, D., Daniels, A., & Haut, C. (2014) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.12.009 · Cited by 122
Sound clinical judgment in nursing: A concept analysis: MANETTI
Manetti, W. (2019) · Nursing Forum · doi:10.1111/nuf.12303 · Cited by 112
Alshehri, F. D., Jones, S., & Harrison, D. (2023) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105679 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Lasater, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Education
- Publisher
- SLACK, Inc.
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 496-503
- ISSN
- 0148-4834 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2421
- OpenAlex
- W2417458004
- Cited by
- 640
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Judgment Development: Using Simulation to Create an Assessment Rubric. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3928/01484834-20071101-04
- The paper
- Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical Judgment Development: Using Simulation to Create an Assessment Rubric. Journal of Nursing Education. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20071101-04
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
