Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 72Inclusion and Disability in Education and SportSocial and Intergroup PsychologyDisability Education and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Path to Greater Inclusivity Through Understanding Implicit Attitudes Toward Disability

Aaberg, Vicki A.·2012·Journal of Nursing Education
DOI 10.3928/01484834-20120706-02
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Individuals with visible disabilities are underrepresented in nursing and have been denied admission to nursing education and discriminated against based on their disability, although nurse educators have been found to hold positive explicit attitudes toward disabled individuals. This study examines nurse educators' implicitly held attitudes toward individuals with disabilities through the use of the Disability Attitude Implicit Association Test. Findings demonstrated that nurse educators are strongly biased toward individuals without disabilities (N = 132, D = 0.76, SD = 0.46) and demonstrated a stronger preference than the general population (N = 38,544, D = 0.45, SD = 0.43). Study results suggest the need for a timely critique of the continuing focus on physical abilities as a prerequisite for admission to nursing programs. In addition, faculty in schools of nursing and practicing nurses must engage in discussions of attitudes toward individuals with visible disabilities for the discipline to be more inclusive.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/01484834-20120706-02

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Maheady D.C. (2003). Nursing students with disabilities: Changing the course. River Edge, NJ: Exceptional Parent Press.
  2. Maheady D.C., Fleming S.E. (2005). Nursing with the hand you are given. Minority Nurse, 12, 50–54.
  3. Ney P.A. (2004). The impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 on collegiate nursing education programs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Widener University Chester Pennsylvania.
  4. Pruett S.R. (2004). A psychometric validation of a Disability Attitude Implicit Association Test (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin Madison.
  5. Trawick S.S. (1990). Attitudes of baccalaureate nursing students and faculty toward persons with physical disabilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University Tallahassee Florida.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Aaberg, V. A.
Affiliations
Seattle Pacific University (US)
Corresponding author
Aaberg, Vicki A.
ORCID
Aaberg, Vicki A.
Venue
Journal of Nursing Education
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2012-09
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
505-510
ISSN
  • 0148-4834 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2421
DOI
10.3928/01484834-20120706-02
OpenAlex
W2329970816
Cited by
64
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
nursing faculty, disability discrimination, visible disability, diversity in nursing
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Dibenzocycloheptenes, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Faculty, Nursing, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Prejudice, Students, Nursing, Nursing Education Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.