Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Influence of Study Habits on Myopia in Jewish Teenagers

Zylbermann, Roger, Landau, David, Berson, David·1993·Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus

Abstract

ABSTRACT The prevalence and degree of myopia were measured in 870 teenagers, males and females. We found a statistically significantly higher prevalence and degree of myopia in a group of 193 Orthodox Jewish male students who differed from the rest in their study habits. Orthodox schooling is characterized by sustained near vision and frequent changes in accommodation due to the swaying habit during study and the variety of print size. A possible myopic effect of this unique visual demand is postulated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/0191-3913-19930901-12

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Zylbermann, R., Landau, D., & Berson, D.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
1993-09
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
319-322
ISSN
  • 0191-3913 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2405
OpenAlex
W198015242
Cited by
253
References
0
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Influence of Study Habits on Myopia in Jewish Teenagers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3928/0191-3913-19930901-12
The paper
Zylbermann, R., Landau, D., & Berson, D. (1993). The Influence of Study Habits on Myopia in Jewish Teenagers. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. https://doi.org/10.3928/0191-3913-19930901-12

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.