The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corneal First Surface Optical Aberrations and Visual Performance
Abstract
ABSTRACT PURPOSE: Wavefront analysis has demonstrated that refractive surgery-induced corneal first surface aberrations are large, are dominated by symmetric aberrations (spherical-like aberrations), and are correlated to measures of visual performance. It is not clear whether the correlation between corneal first surface aberrations and visual performance can be generalized to other corneal conditions where large asymmetric aberrations (coma-like aberrations) may dominate the aberration structure. The purpose of the research reported here was to determine the general utility of corneal first surface wavefront analysis in predicting visual performance. METHODS: Patients were 13 normals and 78 patients with a variety of corneal conditions including surgically removed pterygia, penetrating keratoplasty, keratoconus, radial keratotomy, laser in situ keratomileusis, and others. Videokeratographs were taken for all patients and used to calculate corneal first surface wavefront variance for 3 and 7 mm pupils. Similarly, visual performance was quantified by measurements of contrast sensitivity and high and low contrast acuities through both 3 and 7 mm pupils. RESULTS: Statistically significant correlations existed between all three measures of visual performance and the corneal wavefront variance. All relationships were stronger for the 7 mm diameterpupil condition than the 3 mm pupil. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the cause, corneas with increased wavefront variance showed a quantifiable decrease in visual performance that was pupil size dependent. [J Refract Surg 2000; 16: 507-514]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance
Applegate, R. A., Marsack, J. D., Ramos, R., & Sarver, E. J. (2003) · Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00334-1 · Cited by 403
Self-citationMetrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance
Marsack, J. D., Thibos, L. N., & Applegate, R. A. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.4.8 · Cited by 341
Self-citationWavefront optics and retinal image quality
Oliveira, C. M., & Franco, S. (2013) · Optometry Reports · doi:10.4081/optometry.2013.e1 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Applegate, R. A., Hilmantel, G., Howland, H. C., Tu, E. Y., Starck, T., & Zayac, E. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Refractive Surgery
- Publisher
- SLACK, Inc.
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 507-514
- ISSN
- 1042-962X (ISSN-L)
- 1081-597X
- OpenAlex
- W26569433
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corneal First Surface Optical Aberrations and Visual Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3928/1081-597x-20000901-04
- The paper
- Applegate, R. A., Hilmantel, G., Howland, H. C., Tu, E. Y., Starck, T., & Zayac, E. J. (2000). Corneal First Surface Optical Aberrations and Visual Performance. Journal of Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597x-20000901-04
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.