Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Sequential vs Same-Day Simultaneous Collagen Cross-Linking and Topography-Guided PRK for Treatment of Keratoconus

Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John·2009·Journal of Refractive Surgery

Abstract

Purpose: The safety and efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) and topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using a different sequence and timing were evaluated in consecutive keratoconus cases. Methods: This study included a total of 325 eyes with keratoconus. Eyes were divided into two groups. The first group (n=127 eyes) underwent CXL with subsequent topography-guided PRK performed 6 months later (sequential group) and the second group (n=198 eyes) underwent CXL and PRK in a combined procedure on the same day (simultaneous group). Statistical differences were examined for pre- to postoperative changes in uncorrected (UCVA, logMAR) and best-spectaclecorrected visual acuity (BSCVA, logMAR), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), keratometry (K), topography, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count, corneal haze, and ectatic progression. Mean follow-up was 36±18 months (range: 24 to 68 months). Results: At last follow-up in the sequential group, the mean UCVA improved from 0.9±0.3 logMAR to 0.49±0.25 logMAR, and mean BSCVA from 0.41±0.25 logMAR to 0.16±0.22 logMAR. Mean reduction in spherical equivalent refraction was 2.50±1.20 diopters (D), mean haze score was 1.2±0.5, and mean reduction in K was 2.75±1.30 D. In the simultaneous group, mean UCVA improved from 0.96±0.2 logMAR to 0.3±0.2 logMAR, and mean BSCVA from 0.39±0.3 logMAR to 0.11±0.16 logMAR. Mean reduction in spherical equivalent refraction was 3.20±1.40 D, mean haze score was 0.5±0.3, and mean reduction in K was 3.50±1.3 D. Endothelial cell count preoperatively and at last follow-up was unchanged ( P <.05) in both groups. Statistically, the simultaneous group did better ( P <.05) in all fields evaluated, with improvement in UCVA and BSCVA, a greater mean reduction in spherical equivalent refraction and keratometry, and less corneal haze. Conclusions: Same-day simultaneous topography-guided PRK and CXL appears to be superior to sequential CXL with later PRK in the visual rehabilitation of progressing keratoconus. [ J Refract Surg . 2009;25:S812–S818.]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/1081597x-20090813-10

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Metadata

Authors
Kanellopoulos, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2009-09
Volume
25
Issue
S3
Pages
S812-8
ISSN
  • 1042-962X (ISSN-L)
  • 1081-597X
OpenAlex
W2076849341
Cited by
320
References
10
FWCI
12.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Sequential vs Same-Day Simultaneous Collagen Cross-Linking and Topography-Guided PRK for Treatment of Keratoconus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3928/1081597x-20090813-10
The paper
Kanellopoulos, A. J. (2009). Comparison of Sequential vs Same-Day Simultaneous Collagen Cross-Linking and Topography-Guided PRK for Treatment of Keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20090813-10

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.