The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin–ultraviolet-A-induced cross-linking
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical effect of combined riboflavin-ultraviolet A (UVA) treatment on porcine and human corneas. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany. METHODS: Corneal strips from 5 human enucleated eyes and 20 porcine cadaver corneas were treated with the photosensitizer riboflavin and irradiated with 2 double UVA diodes (370 nm, irradiance = 3 mW/cm2) for 30 minutes. After cross-linking, static stress-strain measurements of the treated and untreated corneas were performed using a microcomputer-controlled biomaterial tester with a prestress of 5 x 10(3) Pa. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in corneal rigidity after cross-linking, indicated by a rise in stress in treated porcine corneas (by 71.9%) and human corneas (by 328.9%) and in Young's modulus by the factor 1.8 in porcine corneas and 4.5 in human corneas. The mean central corneal thickness was 850 microm +/- 70 (SD) in porcine corneas and 550 +/- 40 microm in human corneas. CONCLUSIONS: Riboflavin-UVA-induced collagen cross-linking led to an increase in mechanical rigidity in porcine corneas and an even greater increase in human corneas. As collagen cross-linking is maximal in the anterior 300 microm of the cornea, the greater stiffening effect in human corneas can be explained by the relatively larger portion of the cornea being cross-linked in the overall thinner human cornea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Corneal Collagen Crosslinking: A Systematic Review
Sorkin, N., & Varssano, D. (2014) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000357979 · Cited by 1,918
Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One-year results
Hersh, P. S., Greenstein, S. A., & Fry, K. L. (2011) · Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.030 · Cited by 451
Kanellopoulos, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20090813-10 · Cited by 320
Full-field deformation of bovine cornea under constrained inflation conditions
Boyce, B. L., Grazier, J. M., Jones, R. E., & Nguyen, T. D. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.011 · Cited by 191
Elastography imaging: the 30 year perspective
Ormachea, J., & Parker, K. J. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abca00 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Wollensak, G., Spoerl, E., & Seiler, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1780-1785
- ISSN
- 0146-2776 (ISSN-L)
- 0886-3350
- OpenAlex
- W2150023663
- Cited by
- 1,024
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin–ultraviolet-A-induced cross-linking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00407-3
- The paper
- Wollensak, G., Spoerl, E., & Seiler, T. (2003). Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin–ultraviolet-A-induced cross-linking. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00407-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.