The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Security of User Interfaces: Attacks and Countermeasures
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, social engineering attacks, such as SIM swapping, caused by the lack of security awareness training, have further overcome the security added by OTPs [100].”
From How many FIDO protocols are needed? Analysing the technology, security and compliance (2024) · cites this paper as [100]
Citations
Cites
Dissecting Android Malware: Characterization and Evolution
Zhou, Y., & Jiang, X. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2012.16 · Cited by 2,133
Detecting repackaged smartphone applications in third-party android marketplaces
Zhou, W., Zhou, Y., Jiang, X., & Ning, P. (2012) · Proceedings of the second ACM conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy · doi:10.1145/2133601.2133640 · Cited by 590
Keyboard acoustic emanations revisited
Li, Z., Zhou, F., & Tygar, J. D. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/1609956.1609959 · Cited by 251
Cited by
How many FIDO protocols are needed? Analysing the technology, security and compliance
Angelogianni, A., Politis, I., & Xenakis, C. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3654661 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Malisa, L.
- Venue
- ETH Zurich
- Publisher
- ETH Zurich
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W2917757812
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Keywords
- user interface security, attacks, countermeasures, human-computer interaction security, user authentication, biometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Security of User Interfaces: Attacks and Countermeasures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3929/ethz-b-000217453
- The paper
- Malisa, L. (2017). Security of User Interfaces: Attacks and Countermeasures. ETH Zurich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000217453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
