Robustness of performance and stability for multistep and updated multistep MPC schemes
Open accessAbstract
We consider a model predictive control approach to approximate the solution of infinite horizon optimal control problems for perturbed nonlinear discrete time systems. By reducing the number of re-optimizations, the computational load can be lowered considerably at the expense of reduced robustness of the closed-loop solution against perturbations. In this paper, we propose and analyze an update strategy based on re-optimizations on shrinking horizons which is computationally less expensive than that based on full horizon re-optimization, and at the same time allowing for rigorously quantifiable robust performance estimates.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the method in [34] and [35] is applied, the cumulative error bound rises with increasing N.
“It still results in the rise of the cumulative error bound with increasing N , if the method in [34] and [35] is applied.”
From Incremental Model Predictive Control Exploiting Time-Delay Estimation for a Robot Manipulator (2022) · cites this paper as [34]
Section 6 (pp. 13–15) derives perturbation and performance bounds over a finite horizon N, but the readable passages do not say that a cumulative error bound rises as N increases. I searched for cumulative error and increasing-horizon error bounds; the relevant formulas are not decoded in our copy, so they cannot settle that trend. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
(1995) · Cited by 10,558 · see citing works
Model predictive control: Theory and practice—A survey
García, C. E., Prett, D. M., & Morari, M. (1989) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(89)90002-2 · Cited by 5,351 · see citing works
Nonlinear Model Predictive Control
Grüne, L., & Pannek, J. (2011) · Communications and control engineering/Communications and control engineering series · doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-501-9 · Cited by 1,326 · see citing works
Self-citationThe advanced-step NMPC controller: Optimality, stability and robustness
Zavala, V. M., & Biegler, L. T. (2008) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.06.011 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Economic receding horizon control without terminal constraints
Grüne, L. (2013) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2012.12.003 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the Infinite Horizon Performance of Receding Horizon Controllers
Grüne, L., & Rantzer, A. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.927799 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationGrüne, L. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization · doi:10.1137/070707853 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Self-citationAnalysis of Unconstrained Nonlinear MPC Schemes with Time Varying Control Horizon
Grüne, L., Pannek, J., Seehafer, M., & Worthmann, K. (2010) · SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization · doi:10.1137/090758696 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationClocks and Insensitivity to Small Measurement Errors
Sontag, E. D. (1999) · ESAIM Control Optimisation and Calculus of Variations · doi:10.1051/cocv:1999121 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Sensitivity Analysis and Real-Time Optimization of Parametric Nonlinear Programming Problems
Büskens, C., & Maurer, H. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-04331-8_1 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Bock, H. G., Diehl, M., Kostina, E., & Schlöder, J. P. (2007) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9780898718935.ch1 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Solution differentiability for parametric nonlinear control problems with control-state constraints
Maurer, H., & Pesch, H. J. (1995) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/bf02192081 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Further Results on Robustness of (Possibly Discontinuous) Sample and Hold Feedback
Kellett, C. M., Shim, H., & Teel, A. R. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.831184 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Practical NMPC suboptimality estimates along trajectories
Grüne, L., & Pannek, J. (2008) · Systems & Control Letters · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2008.10.012 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationNumerical computation of neighboring optimum feedback control schemes in real-time
Pesch, H. J. (1979) · Applied Mathematics & Optimization · doi:10.1007/bf01442556 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
On the Benefit of Re-optimization in Optimal Control under Perturbations
Grüne, L., & Palma, V. G. (2013) · EPub Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationStability, performance and robustness of sensitivity-based multistep feedback NMPC
Palma, V. G., & Grüne, L. (2012) · EPub Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationA General Framework for Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Abstract UpdatesPreprint
Pannek, J., Michael, J., & Gerdts, M. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1309.1610 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [12][12] H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems , Prentice Hall PTR, 2002. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Incremental Model Predictive Control Exploiting Time-Delay Estimation for a Robot Manipulator
Wang, Y., Leibold, M., Lee, J., Ye, W., Xie, J., & Buss, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2022.3142629 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grüne, L., & Palma, V. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Bayreuth (DE)
- ORCID
- Grüne, Lars
- Venue
- Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4385-4414
- ISSN
- 1078-0947 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-5231
- OpenAlex
- W2026367073
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- inria.hal.science
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems (publishedVersion)
- EPub Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
- Keywords
- model predictive control, robustness, closed-loop stability, infinite horizon optimal control, discrete-time nonlinear systems, perturbed systems, reoptimization, computational complexity reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review