Cited by 3Control and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems

Adaptive PID sliding mode control based on new Quasi-sliding mode and radial basis function neural network for Omni-directional mobile robot

Open access
Pham, Thanh Tung, Nguyen, Chi-Ngon·2023·AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering

Abstract

This article designs a PID sliding mode controller based on new Quasi-sliding mode (PID-SMC-NQ) and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) for Omni-directional mobile robot. This is holonomic vehicles that can perform translational and rotational motions independently and simultaneously. The PID-SMC is designed to ensure that the robot's actual trajectory follows the desired in a finite time with the error converges to zero. To decrease chattering phenomena around the sliding surface, in the controller robust term, this paper uses the tanh (hyperbolic tangent) function, so called the new Quasi-sliding mode function, instead of the switch function. The RBFNN is used to approximate the nonlinear component in the PID-SMC-NQ controller. The RBFNN is considered as an adaptive controller. The weights of the network are trained online due to the feedback from output signals of the robot using the Gradient Descent algorithm. The stability of the system is proven by Lyapunov's theory. Simulation results in MATLAB/Simulink show the effectiveness of the proposed controller, the actual response of the robot converges to the reference with the rising time reaches 307.711 ms, 364.192 ms in the x-coordinate in the two-dimensional movement of the robot, the steady-state error is 0.0018 m and 0.00007 m, the overshoot is 0.13% and 0.1% in the y-coordinate, and the chattering phenomena is reduced.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3934/electreng.2023007

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PID controller depicts decent accomplishment in overcoming various nonlinearities, such as the chattering effect, delay, and external disturbances present in robotic industries.

    “The PID controller depicts decent accomplishment in overcoming various nonlinearities, such as the chattering effect, delay, and external disturbances present in robotic industries [14].”

    From A comparative study on time-delay estimation for time-delay nonlinear system control (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Abstract and Conclusions report reduced chattering for a PID sliding-mode controller combined with a quasi-sliding-mode function and an RBF neural network. Section 4 reports robust trajectory tracking under simulated sensor noise and parameter changes. The paper does not show that a PID controller alone overcomes these effects or demonstrate that the proposed controller overcomes communication delay; delay appears only as a problem mentioned in the Introduction. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Palací n J, Rubies E, Clotet E, Martí nez D (2021) Evaluation of the Path-Tracking Accuracy of a Three-Wheeled Omnidirectional Mobile Robot Designed as a Personal Assistant. Sensors 21: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217216 · DOI
  2. Mou H (2020) Research On the Formation Method of Omnidirectional Mobile Robot Based On Dynamic Sliding Mode Control. Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 18: 148-154.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pham, T. T., & Nguyen, C.-N.
Affiliations
  • Vinh Long University of Technology Education (VN)
  • Can Tho University (VN)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Chi-Ngon
Venue
AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering
Published
2023
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
121-134
ISSN
2578-1588 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4361800930
Cited by
3
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Keywords
quasi-sliding mode, radial basis function neural network, omnidirectional mobile robot, chattering reduction, online neural network training, gradient descent, Lyapunov stability, trajectory tracking, finite-time convergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review