Cited by 79Phytoestrogen effects and researchMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effects

Clinical outcomes of a 2-y soy isoflavone supplementation in menopausal women

Open access
Steinberg, Francene M, Murray, Michael J, Lewis, Richard D, Cramer, Margaret A, Amato, Paula, Young, Ronald L, Barnes, Stephen, Konzelmann, Karen L +6 more·2011·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Soy isoflavones are naturally occurring phytochemicals with weak estrogenic cellular effects. Despite numerous clinical trials of short-term isoflavone supplementation, there is a paucity of data regarding longer-term outcomes and safety. Objective Our aim was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of soy hypocotyl isoflavone supplementation in healthy menopausal women as a secondary outcome of a trial on bone health. Design A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 24-mo trial was conducted to assess the effects of daily supplementation with 80 or 120 mg aglycone equivalent soy hypocotyl isoflavones plus calcium and vitamin D on the health of 403 postmenopausal women. At baseline and after 1 and 2 y, clinical blood chemistry values were measured and a well-woman examination was conducted, which included a mammogram and a Papanicolaou test. A cohort also underwent transvaginal ultrasound measurements to assess endometrial thickness and fibroids. Results The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. After 2 y of daily isoflavone exposure, all clinical chemistry values remained within the normal range. The only variable that changed significantly was blood urea nitrogen, which increased significantly after 2 y (P = 0.048) but not after 1 y (P = 0.343) in the supplementation groups. Isoflavone supplementation did not affect blood lymphocyte or serum free thyroxine concentrations. No significant differences in endometrial thickness or fibroids w…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.110.008359

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • None of the RCTs assessing endometrial thickness, mammographic density or changes, nipple aspirate volume, PAP results and uterine fibroid growth, or vaginal cytology found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to control.

    “None of the studies assessing endometrial thickness [132,136,155], mammographic density or mammographic changes [66,132,136,137,144,146], nipple aspirate volume [134], PAP results and uterine fibroid growth [132], or vaginal cytology [155] found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to the control group.”
  • Among all studies, there was report of only one case of breast cancer recurrence that occurred in a soy-allocated subject; and two new cases of breast cancer and one case of endometrial cancer among soy allocated subjects compared to five in control subjects.

    “Amongst all the studies, there was report of only one case of breast cancer recurrence that occurred in a soy-allocated subject [142]; and two new cases of breast cancer and one case of endometrial cancer among soy allocated subjects compared to five in the control subjects [132,145,147,160].”
  • A total of 18 RCTs assessed circulating estrogen levels; 15 of 18 found no significant impact from soy compared to control.

    “A total of 18 RCTs assessed circulating estrogens levels (E1, E2, and/ or E3) Fifteen of 18 studies found no significant impact from soy compared to the control group (p>0.05) [129,132,133,138,140,143,145,147,149,150,155,156,158,160,163].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinberg, F. M., Murray, M. J., Lewis, R. D., Cramer, M. A., Amato, P., Young, R. L., Barnes, S., Konzelmann, K. L., Fischer, J. G., Ellis, K. J., Shypailo, R. J., Fraley, J. K., Smith, E. O., & Wong, W. W.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
356-367
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160121739
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • National Institutes of Health (RR-00188)
  • Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000188)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
soy isoflavones, menopausal women, blood urea nitrogen, endometrial thickness, uterine fibroids, breast cancer, serum biochemistry, lymphocyte count, free thyroxine, calcium and vitamin D
MeSH terms
Blood Urea Nitrogen, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Middle Aged, Plant Extracts, Glycine max, Postmenopause, Hypocotyl, Dietary Supplements, beta-Glucans, Phytoestrogens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review