Cited by 135Muscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and DisordersCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Differences in postprandial protein handling after beef compared with milk ingestion during postexercise recovery: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Burd, Nicholas A, Gorissen, Stefan H, van Vliet, Stephan, Snijders, Tim, van Loon, Luc JC·2015·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Protein consumed after resistance exercise increases postexercise muscle protein synthesis rates. To date, dairy protein has been studied extensively, with little known about the capacity of other protein-dense foods to augment postexercise muscle protein synthesis rates.Objective We aimed to compare protein digestion and absorption kinetics, postprandial amino acid availability, anabolic signaling, and the subsequent myofibrillar protein synthetic response after the ingestion of milk compared with beef during recovery from resistance-type exercise.Design In crossover trials, 12 healthy young men performed a single bout of resistance exercise. Immediately after cessation of exercise, participants ingested 30 g protein by consuming isonitrogenous amounts of intrinsically l-[1-(13)C]phenylalanine-labeled beef or milk. Blood and muscle biopsy samples were collected at rest and after exercise during primed continuous infusions of l-[ring-(2)H5]phenylalanine and l-[ring-3,5-(2)H2]tyrosine to assess protein digestion and absorption kinetics, plasma amino acid availability, anabolic signaling, and subsequent myofibrillar protein synthesis rates in vivo in young men.Results Beef protein-derived phenylalanine appeared more rapidly in circulation compared with milk ingestion (P < 0.001). The availability of phenylalanine during the 5-h postexercise period tended to be higher after beef (64% ± 3%) ingestion than after milk ingestion (57% ± 3%; P = 0.08). Both beef and milk ingestion were followed by an increase in the phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 and 70-kDa S6 protein kinase 1 during postexercise recovery. Milk ingestion increased myofibrillar protein synthesis rates to a greater extent than did beef ingestion during the 0- to 2-h postexercise phase (P = 0.013). However, the increase in myofibrillar protein synthesis rates did not differ between milk and beef ingestion during the entire 0- to 5-h postexercise phase (P = 0.114).Conclusions Both milk and beef ingestion augment the postexercise myofibrillar protein synthetic response in young men, with a stronger stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis during the early postprandial stage after milk ingestion. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01578590.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.114.103184

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Milk, egg, and meat-derived proteins all stimulate robust postexercise MPS responses.

    “For example, milk, egg, and meat-derived proteins all stimulate robust postexercise MPS responses [[66], [67], [68]].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [67]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 135

Authors
Burd, N. A., Gorissen, S. H., van Vliet, S., Snijders, T., & van Loon, L. J.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
102
Issue
4
Pages
828-836
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138597359
Cited by
135
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Maastricht University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
beef protein, milk protein, resistance training, post-exercise recovery, myofibrillar protein synthesis, amino acid availability, mTOR signaling, S6K1 phosphorylation
MeSH terms
Red Meat, Adipose Tissue, Amino Acids, Essential, Animals, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Cattle, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Male, Milk, Muscle Proteins, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review