Cited by 112Vitamin D Research StudiesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsMagnesium in Health and Disease

Vitamin D supplementation has no effect on insulin sensitivity or secretion in vitamin D–deficient, overweight or obese adults: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Mousa, Aya, Naderpoor, Negar, de Courten, Maximilian PJ, Teede, Helena, Kellow, Nicole, Walker, Karen, Scragg, Robert, de Courten, Barbora·2017·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background: Vitamin D supplementation has been proposed as a potential strategy to prevent type 2 diabetes. Existing clinical trials have been limited by short duration, low doses of vitamin D, variability in participants' vitamin D-deficiency status, and the use of surrogate measures of body composition, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion.Objective: To address existing knowledge gaps, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to investigate whether vitamin D supplementation that is provided in a sufficient dose and duration to vitamin D-deficient individuals would improve insulin sensitivity or secretion as measured with the use of gold-standard methods. We hypothesized that vitamin D supplementation would improve insulin sensitivity and secretion compared with placebo.Design: Sixty-five overweight or obese, vitamin D-deficient (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration ≤50 nmol/L) adults were randomly assigned to receive either a bolus oral dose of 100,000 IU cholecalciferol followed by 4000 IU cholecalciferol/d or a matching placebo for 16 wk. Before and after the intervention, participants received gold-standard assessments of body composition (via dual X-ray absorptiometry), insulin sensitivity (via hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps), and insulin secretion [via intravenous-glucose-tolerance tests (IVGTTs)].Results: Fifty-four participants completed the study [35 men and 19 women; mean ± SD age: 31.9 ± 8.5 y; body mass index (in kg/m 2): 30.9 ± 4.4]. 25(OH)D increased with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo (57.0 ± 21.3 compared with 1.9 ± 15.1 nmol/L, respectively; P = 0.02). Vitamin D and placebo groups did not differ in change in insulin sensitivity (0.02 ± 2.0 compared with -0.03 ± 2.8 mg · kg-1 · min-1, respectively; P = 0.9) or first-phase insulin secretion (-21 ± 212 compared with 24 ± 184 mU/L, respectively; P = 0.9). Results remained nonsignificant after adjustment for age, sex, percentage of body fat, sun exposure, physical activity, and dietary vitamin D intake (P > 0.1).Conclusions: Vitamin D supplementation does not improve insulin sensitivity or secretion in vitamin D-deficient, overweight or obese adults, despite using high-dose vitamin D supplementation and robust endpoint measures. Therefore, it is unlikely that vitamin D supplementation would be an effective strategy for reducing diabetes risk even in vitamin D-deficient populations. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02112721.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.117.152736

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mousa, A., Naderpoor, N., de Courten, M. P., Teede, H., Kellow, N., Walker, K., Scragg, R., & de Courten, B.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Monash Health (AU)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
105
Issue
6
Pages
1372-1381
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613905129
Cited by
112
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Monash University (100864, 1047897)
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1047897, 100864)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Magnesium in Health and Disease
Keywords
vitamin D supplementation, vitamin D deficiency, insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, type 2 diabetes prevention, obesity, overweight adults, vitamin D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, first-phase insulin secretion, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, intravenous glucose tolerance test, body composition, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Adult, Blood Glucose, Body Composition, Cholecalciferol, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Obesity, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Deficiency, Absorptiometry, Photon, Dietary Supplements, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review