CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseGastrointestinal motility and disordersFood composition and properties

Low-Residue and Low-Fiber Diets in Gastrointestinal Disease Management

Open access
Vanhauwaert, Erika, Matthys, Christophe, Verdonck, Lies, De Preter, Vicky·2015·Advances in Nutrition
DOI 10.3945/an.115.009688PMC PMC4642427
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recently, low-residue diets were removed from the American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Nutrition Care Manual due to the lack of a scientifically accepted quantitative definition and the unavailability of a method to estimate the amount of food residue produced. This narrative review focuses on defining the similarities and/or discrepancies between low-residue and low-fiber diets and on the diagnostic and therapeutic values of these diets in gastrointestinal disease management. Diagnostically, a low-fiber/low-residue diet is used in bowel preparation. A bowel preparation is a cleansing of the intestines of fecal matter and secretions conducted before a diagnostic procedure. Therapeutically, a low-fiber/low-residue diet is part of the treatment of acute relapses in different bowel diseases. The available evidence on low-residue and low-fiber diets is summarized. The main findings showed that within human disease research, the terms "low residue" and "low fiber" are used interchangeably, and information related to the quantity of residue in the diet usually refers to the amount of fiber. Low-fiber/low-residue diets are further explored in both diagnostic and therapeutic situations. On the basis of this literature review, the authors suggest redefining a low-residue diet as a low-fiber diet and to quantitatively define a low-fiber diet as a diet with a maximum of 10 g fiber/d. A low-fiber diet instead of a low-residue diet is recommended as a diagnostic value or as specific therapy for gastrointestinal conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/an.115.009688

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with irritable bowel syndrome, a low fiber diet may be an effective treatment to relieve symptoms such as abdominal pain, cramps, and distension.

    “a low fiber diet may be an effective treatment to”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [140]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. [1]1. Kong F, Singh RP. Disintegration of solid foods in human stomach. J Food Sci 2008;73:R67 -80.
  2. [2]2. Hamer HM, De Preter V, Windey K, Verbeke K. Functional analysis of colonic bacterial metabolism: relevant to health? Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2012;302:G1 -9.
  3. [3]3. Cunningham E. Are low-residue diets still applicable? J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:960.
  4. [4]4. Anderson JW, Baird P, Davis RH, Ferreri S, Knudtson M, Koraym A, Waters V, Williams CL. Health benefits of dietary fiber. Nutr Rev 2009;67:188 -205.
  5. [5]5. Tarleton S, DiBaise JK. Low-residue diet in diverticular disease: putting an end to a myth. Nutr Clin Pract 2011;26:137.
  6. [6]6. Trowell H. Definition of dietary fiber and hypotheses that it is a protective factor in certain diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 1976;29: 417 -27.
  7. [10]10. Howlett JF, Betteridge VA, Champ M, Craig SA, Meheust A, Jones JM. The definition of dietary fiber -discussions at the Ninth Vahouny Fiber Symposium: building scientific agreement. Food Nutr Res 2010;54: 5750 -5.
  8. [11]11. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition Allergies. Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre. EFSA J 2010;8:1462 -1539.
  9. [13]13. Slavin J. Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients 2013;5:1417 -35.
  10. [14]14. De Preter V, Hamer HM, Windey K, Verbeke K. The impact of preand/or probiotics on human colonic metabolism: does it affect human health? Mol Nutr Food Res 2011;55:46 -57.
  11. [15]15. Schneeman BO. Fiber, inulin and oligofructose: similarities and differences. J Nutr 1999;129:1424S -7S.
  12. [16]16. Stephen AM, Cummings JH. Mechanisms of dietary action of fibre in the human colon. Nature 1980;284:283 -4.
  13. [17]17. Stephen AM, Cummings JH. The microbial contribution to human faecal mass. J Med Microbiol 1980;13:45 -56.
  14. [18]18. Lijoi D, Ferrero S, Mistrangelo E, Casa ID, Crosa M, Remorgida V, Alessandri F. Bowel preparation before laparoscopic gynaecological surgery in benign conditions using a 1-week low fibre diet: a surgeon blind, randomized and controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 280:713 -8.
  15. [19]19. Woolner JT, Kirby G. Clinical audit of the effects of low-fibre diet on irritable bowel syndrome. J Hum Nutr Diet 2000;13:249 -53.
  16. [20]20. Liedenbaum MH, Denters M, De Vries A, Van Ravesteijn V, Bipat S, Vos F, Dekker E, Stoker J. Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: influence on image quality and patient acceptance. AJR 2010;195:W31 -7.
  17. [21]21. Delegge M, Kaplan R. Efficacy of bowel preparation with the use of a prepackaged, low fibre diet with a low sodium, magnesium citrate cathartic vs. a clear liquid diet with a standard sodium phosphate cathartic. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:1491 -5.
  18. [22]22. Hookey LC, Depew W, Vanner S. The safety profile of oral sodium phosphate for colonic cleansing before colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:895 -902.
  19. [23]23. Dachman AH, Dawson DO, Lefere P, Yoshida H, Khan NU, Cipriani N, Rubin DT. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Abdom Imaging 2007;32:96 -104.
  20. [24]24. Virkki R, Mäkelä P. Low residual diet and hydration improving double contract examination of the colon. Eur J Radiol 1983;3:212 -4.
  21. [25]25. Park DI, Park SH, Lee SK, Baek YH, Han DS, Eun CS, Kim WH, Byeon JS, Yang SK. Efficacy of prepackaged, low residual test meals with 4L polyethylene glycol versus a clear liquid diet with 4L polyethylene glycol bowel preparation: a randomized trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 24:988 -91.
  22. [26]26. Sipe BW, Fischer M, Baluyut AR, Bishop RH, Born LJ, Daugherty DF, Lybik MJ, Shatara TJ, Scheidler MD, Wilson SA, et al. A low-residue diet improved patient satisfaction with split-dose oral sulfate solution without impairing colonic preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77: 932 -6.
  23. [27]27. Kim YS, Hong CW, Kim BC, Han KS, Park JW, Seong Choi H, Joo J, Sohn DK. Randomized clinical trial comparing reduced-volume oral picosulfate and a prepackaged low-residue diet with 4-liter PEG solution for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:522 -8.
  24. [28]28. Soweid AM, Kobeissy AA, Jamali FR, El-Tarchichi M, Skoury A, AbdulBaki H, El-Zahabi L, El-Sayyed A, Barada KA, Sharara AI, et al. A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Endoscopy 2010;42:633 -8.
  25. [29]29. Melicharkova A, Flemming J, Vanner S, Hookey L. A low-residue breakfast improves patient tolerance without impacting quality of low-volume colon cleansing prior to colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:1551 -5.
  26. [30]30. Stolpman DR, Solem CA, Eastlick D, Adlis S, Shaw MJ. A randomized controlled trial comparing a low-residue diet versus clear liquids for colonoscopy preparation: impact on tolerance, procedure time, and adenoma detection rate. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014;48:851 -5.
  27. [31]31. Wu K-L, Rayner K, Chuah S-K, Chiu K-W, Chiu Y-C. Impact of a lowresidue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:107 -12.
  28. [32]32. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:482 -6.
  29. [33]33. Muzii L, Angioli R, Zullo MA, Calcagno M, Panici PB. Bowel preparation for gynecological surgery. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003;48:311 -5.
  30. [34]34. Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Polkowski M, Rembacken B, Saunders B, Benamouzig R, Holme O, Green S, Kuiper T, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013;45:142 -50.
  31. [35]35. Brown AC, Rampertab SD, Mullin GE. Existing dietary guidelines for Crohn ' s disease and ulcerative colitis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;5:411 -25.
  32. [37]37. Francis CY, Whorwell PJ. Bran and irritable bowel syndrome: time for reappraisal. Lancet 1994;344:39 -40.
  33. [38]38. Parker TJ, Naylor SJ, Riordan AM, Hunter JO. Management of patients with food intolerance in irritable bowel syndrome: the development and use of an exclusion diet. J Hum Nutr Diet 1995;8: 159 -66.
  34. [39]39. Hammonds R, Whorwell PJ. The role of fibre in IBS. Ital J Gastroenterol 1997;2:9 -12.
  35. [40]40. Tuck CJ, Muir JG, Barrett JS, Gibson PR. Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols: role in irritable bowel syndrome. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;8:819 -34.
  36. [41]41. Floch MH, Bina I. The natural history of diverticulitis: fact and theory. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004;38:S2 -7.
  37. [42]42. Peery AF, Sandler RS, Ahnen DJ, Galanko JA, Holm AN, Shaukat A, Mott LA, Barry EL, Fried DA, Baron JA. Constipation and a low-fiber diet are not associated with diverticulosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1622 -7.
  38. [43]43. Peery AF, Barrett PR, Park D, Rogers AJ, Galanko JA, Martin CF, Sandler RS. A high-fiber diet does not protect against asymptomatic diverticulosis. Gastroenterology 2012;142:266 -72.e1.
  39. [44]44. Wick JY. Diverticular disease: eat your fiber! Consult Pharm 2012;27: 613 -8.
  40. [45]45. Suares NC, Ford AC. Systematic review: the effects of fibre in the management of chronic idiopathic constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;33:895 -901.
  41. [46]46. Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A. Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100: 232 -42.
  42. [47]47. Johanson JF. Review of the treatment options for chronic constipation. MedGenMed 2007;9:25.
  43. [48]48. Ho KS, Tan CY, Mohd Daud MA, Seow-Choen F. Stopping or reducing dietary fiber intake reduces constipation and its associated symptoms. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:4593 -6.
  44. [49]49. Lau C, Phillips E, Bresee C, Fleshner P. Early use of low residue diets is superior to clear liquid diet after elective colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2014;260:641 -7.
  45. [50]50. Park JS, Sohn CI, Hwang SJ, Choi HS, Park JH, Kim HJ, Park DI, Cho YK, Jeon WK, Kim BI. Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2007;39:616 -9.
  46. [51]51. Chen CC, Ng WW, Chang FY, Lee SD. Magnesium citrate-bisacodyl regimen proves better than castor oil for colonoscopic preparation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999;14:1219 -22.
  47. [52]52. Gupta T, Mandot A, Desai D, Abraham P, Joshi A, Shah S. Comparison of two schedules (previous evening versus same morning) of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2007;39:706 -9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanhauwaert, E., Matthys, C., Verdonck, L., & De Preter, V.
Affiliations
  • University Colleges Leuven-Limburg (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Vanhauwaert, Erika
ORCID
Matthys, Christophe
Venue
Advances in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
820-827
ISSN
  • 2156-5376 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8313
DOI
10.3945/an.115.009688
PMC
PMC4642427
OpenAlex
W2174718193
Cited by
77
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Advances in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
low-residue diet, low-fiber diet, dietary fiber, bowel preparation
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Colonoscopy, Diet, Dietary Fiber, Digestion, Feces, Fermentation, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review