Shifts in the rumen microbiota due to the type of carbohydrate and level of protein ingested by dairy cattle are associated with changes in rumen fermentation
Open accessAbstract
Balancing energy and nitrogen in the rumen is a key to both profitability and environmental sustainability. Four dairy cows were used in a Latin square experimental design to investigate the effect of severe nitrogen underfeeding (110 vs. 80% of requirements) and the type of carbohydrate consumed [neutral detergent fiber rich (FIB) vs. starch rich (STA)] on the rumen ecosystem. These dietary treatments modified both rumen fermentation and microbial populations. Compared with STA diets, consumption of FIB diets increased bacterial and fungal diversity in the rumen and also increased the concentrations of cellulolytic microorganisms, including protozoa (+38%), anaerobic fungi (+59%), and methanogens (+27%). This microbial adaptation to fiber utilization led to similar digestibility values for the 2 carbohydrate sources and was accompanied by a shift in the rumen fermentation patterns; when the FIB diets were consumed, the cows had greater ruminal pH, ammonia concentrations, and molar proportions of acetate and propionate compared with when they consumed the STA diets. Certain rumen microorganisms were sensitive to a shortage of nitrogen; rumen concentrations of ammonia were 49% lower when the low-protein (LP) diets were consumed as were total bacteria (-13%), anaerobic fungi (-28%), methanogens (-27%), protozoa (-19%), cellulolytic bacteria, and microbial diversity compared with when the high-protein (HP) diets were consumed. As a result, the digestibility of the LP diets was less than that of the HP diets. These findings demonstrated that the rumen microbial ecosystem is directly linked to the rumen fermentation pattern and, to some extent, to the efficiency of diet utilization by dairy cattle.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Animals fed high-grain diets tend to have lower bacterial diversity and lower concentrations of fibrolytic microbes (protozoa and anaerobic fungi), which are generally associated with lower rumen proteolysis and ultimately higher feed efficiency.
“animals fed high-grain diets tend to have lower bacterial diversity and lower concentrations of fibrolytic microbes (i.e., protozoa and anaerobic fungi), which are generally associated with lower rumen proteolysis and ultimately higher feed efficiency (Belanche et al., 2012).”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Belanche et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 287
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fanchone A, Doreau M, Nozie `re P. Effect of N underfeeding and energy source on milk production and N partition in dairy cow. Advances in Animal Biosciences. Proc BSAS. 2011;2:196.
- Fanchone A, Nozie `re P, Portelli J, Chauveau-Duriot B, Largeau V, Doreau M. Effect of N underfeeding and energy source on ruminal digestion and protein metabolism in dairy cows. Advances in Animal Biosciences. Proc BSAS. 2011;2:197.
- Authors
- Belanche, A., Doreau, M., Edwards, J. E., Moorby, J. M., Pinloche, E., & Newbold, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Aberystwyth University (GB)
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Newbold, Charles J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1684-1692
- ISSN
- 0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037251176
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 19.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/W/10964A01B, BBS/E/W/10964A01A, BBS/E/W/10964A01C)
- FP7 Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- rumen microbiota, dairy cattle, dietary protein level, dietary fiber, starch, rumen fermentation, rumen pH, ammonia, volatile fatty acids, methanogenic archaea, anaerobic fungi, rumen protozoa, cellulolytic bacteria, microbial diversity, nutrient digestibility
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Cattle, Circadian Rhythm, Dairying, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Female, Fermentation, Genes, Bacterial, Models, Biological, Nitrogen, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Rumen, Neocallimastigales, Metagenome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review