Cited by 271Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareChild Nutrition and Water Access

Distribution and Determinants of Low Birth Weight in Developing Countries

Open access
Mahumud, Rashidul Alam, Sultana, Marufa, Sarker, Abdur Razzaque·2017·Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Low birth weight (LBW) is a major public health concern, especially in developing countries, and is frequently related to child morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to identify key determinants that influence the prevalence of LBW in selected developing countries. METHODS: Secondary data analysis was conducted using 10 recent Demography and Health Surveys from developing countries based on the availability of the required information for the years 2010 to 2013. Associations of demographic, socioeconomic, community-based, and individual factors of the mother with LBW in infants were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of LBW in the study countries was 15.9% (range, 9.0 to 35.1%). The following factors were shown to have a significant association with the risk of having an LBW infant in developing countries: maternal age of 35 to 49 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.1; p<0.01), inadequate antenatal care (ANC) (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.8; p<0.01), illiteracy (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.7; p<0.001), delayed conception (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5; p<0.001), low body mass index (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.1; p<0.001) and being in the poorest socioeconomic stratum (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that delayed conception, advanced maternal age, and inadequate ANC visits had independent effects on the prevalence of LBW. Strategies should be implemented based on these findings with the goal of developing policy options for improving the overall maternal health status in developing countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3961/jpmph.16.087

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 91% of LBW infants are born in low- and middle-income countries and the majority are moderately LBW (1500-<2500g).

    “Although 91% of LBW infants are born in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and the majority are moderately LBW (MLBW) (1500-<2500g) [4–6]; research is predominantly from high-income countries and focuses on very LBW (<1500g) or preterm infants [7].”

    From Facility-based care for moderately low birthweight infants in India, Malawi, and Tanzania (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction says that 96.5% of LBW infants are born in developing countries, supporting the broad geographic point but not the claimed 91% figure for low- and middle-income countries. The Results > Population Characteristics section gives an average LBW birth weight of 2179 g, but does not establish that a majority fall in the 1500–<2500 g category. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahumud, R. A., Sultana, M., & Sarker, A. R.
Affiliations
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (BD)
Corresponding author
Mahumud, Rashidul Alam
Venue
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
Published
2017-01-31
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
18-28
ISSN
  • 1975-8375 (ISSN-L)
  • 2233-4521
OpenAlex
W2563153563
Cited by
271
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 3
FWCI
21.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
  • Department for International Development
  • Global Affairs Canada
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
low birth weight, determinants of low birth weight, maternal age, advanced maternal age, prenatal care, maternal illiteracy, delayed conception, maternal body mass index, socioeconomic status, maternal health, infant health, developing countries
MeSH terms
Literacy, Adolescent, Adult, Developing Countries, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Male, Maternal Age, Prenatal Care, Socioeconomic Factors, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review