The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Allocation of Talent and U.S. Economic Growth
Abstract
In 1960, 94 percent of doctors and lawyers were white men. By 2010, the fraction was just 62 percent. Similar changes in other highly‐skilled occupations have occurred throughout the U.S. economy during the last 50 years. Given that the innate talent for these professions is unlikely to have changed differently across groups, the change in the occupational distribution since 1960 suggests that a substantial pool of innately talented women and black men in 1960 were not pursuing their comparative advantage. We examine the effect on aggregate productivity of the convergence in the occupational distribution between 1960 and 2010 through the prism of a Roy model. Across our various specifications, between 20% and 40% of growth in aggregate market output per person can be explained by the improved allocation of talent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2019) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.109.612 · Cited by 10,902
Cragg, J. G., & Zarembka, P. (1975) · The Canadian Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/134075 · Cited by 8,342
Journal of Economic Literature
(2019) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.109.633 · Cited by 7,468
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Kuznets, S. (2024) · Business Cycle Theory, Part I Volume 4 · doi:10.4324/9781003549741-8 · Cited by 7,176
Technology, Geography, and Trade
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · Cited by 4,485
Harrison, A., Robinson, C., Ashenfelter, O., & Layard, R. (1989) · The Canadian Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/135687 · Cited by 3,153
SOME THOUGHTS ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF EARNINGS 1
ROY, A. D. (1951) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041827 · Cited by 2,958
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
(2017) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app · Cited by 1,625
The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions
Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2002) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/340778 · Cited by 1,389
The Role of Premarket Factors in Black-White Wage Differences
Neal, D. A., & Johnson, W. R. (1996) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/262045 · Cited by 1,340
Cited by
Social Norms as a Barrier to Women’s Employment in Developing Countries
Jayachandran, S. (2021) · IMF Economic Review · doi:10.1057/s41308-021-00140-w · Cited by 444
Pink work: Same-sex marriage, employment and discrimination
Sansone, D. (2019) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104086 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsieh, C.-T., Hurst, E., Jones, C. I., & Klenow, P. J.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1439-1474
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2974391059
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 71.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Allocation of Talent and U.S. Economic Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3982/ecta11427
- The paper
- Hsieh, C.-T., Hurst, E., Jones, C. I., & Klenow, P. J. (2019). The Allocation of Talent and U.S. Economic Growth. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta11427
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.