Cited by 94LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Pink work: Same-sex marriage, employment and discrimination

Sansone, Dario·2019·Journal of Public Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104086

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sansone, D.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Sansone, Dario
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
180
Pages
104086
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883704562
Cited by
94
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
same-sex marriage, same-sex couples, labor supply, employment, sexual orientation discrimination, household production, tax law, health insurance, adoption law, attitudes toward sexual minorities, marriage legalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review