The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth
Abstract
We provide a systematic analysis of the properties of individual returns to wealth using 12 years of population data from Norway's administrative tax records. We document a number of novel results. First, individuals earn markedly different average returns on their net worth (a standard deviation of 22.1%) and on its components. Second, heterogeneity in returns does not arise merely from differences in the allocation of wealth between safe and risky assets: returns are heterogeneous even within narrow asset classes. Third, returns are positively correlated with wealth: moving from the 10th to the 90th percentile of the net worth distribution increases the return by 18 percentage points (and 10 percentage points if looking at net‐of‐tax returns). Fourth, individual wealth returns exhibit substantial persistence over time. We argue that while this persistence partly arises from stable differences in risk exposure and assets scale, it also reflects heterogeneity in sophistication and financial information, as well as entrepreneurial talent. Finally, wealth returns are correlated across generations. We discuss the implications of these findings for several strands of the wealth inequality debate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Capital in the Twenty-First Century
Piketty, T. (2014) · doi:10.4159/9780674369542 · Cited by 14,437
Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model
Merton, R. C. (1971) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-x · Cited by 5,958
Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case
Merton, R. C. (1969) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926560 · Cited by 5,187
The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy
Deaton, A. (1997) · doi:10.1596/0-8018-5254-4 · Cited by 4,877
On the Size Distribution of Business Firms
Lucas, R. E. (1978) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003596 · Cited by 3,236
Where is the land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States *
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. (2014) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju022 · Cited by 2,922
Uninsured Idiosyncratic Risk and Aggregate Saving
Aiyagari, S. R. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118417 · Cited by 2,795
Estimation of Dynamic Models with Error Components
Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1981) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1981.10477691 · Cited by 2,281
Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy
Krusell, P., & Smith, Jr. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250034 · Cited by 2,255
CAMPBELL, J. Y. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00883.x · Cited by 2,178
Cited by
Gomes, F., Haliassos, M., & Ramadorai, T. (2021) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20201461 · Cited by 396
Uneven growth: automation’s impact on income and wealth inequality
Moll, B., Rachel, L., & Restrepo, P. (2022) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta19417 · Cited by 148
Wealth Inequality and the Racial Wealth Gap
Aladangady, A., & Forde, A. (2021) · FEDS Notes · doi:10.17016/2380-7172.2861 · Cited by 70
Refinancing cross-subsidies in the mortgage market
Fisher, J., Gavazza, A., Liu, L., Ramadorai, T., & Tripathy, J. (2024) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103876 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Fagereng, A., Guiso, L., Malacrino, D., & Pistaferri, L.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-170
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124460636
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 83.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.