The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?
Abstract
I discuss the failure of the canonical search and matching model to match the cyclical volatility in the job finding rate. I show that job creation in the model is influenced by wages in new matches. I summarize microeconometric evidence and find that wages in new matches are volatile and consistent with the model's key predictions. Therefore, explanations of the unemployment volatility puzzle have to preserve the cyclical volatility of wages. I discuss a modification of the model, based on fixed matching costs, that can increase cyclical unemployment volatility and is consistent with wage flexibility in new matches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Employment Fluctuations with Equilibrium Wage Stickiness
Hall, R. E. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828053828482 · Cited by 1,439
Cited by
Recessions and the Costs of Job Loss
Davis, S. J., & von Wachter, T. (2011) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2011.0016 · Cited by 533
Who Profits from Patents? Rent-Sharing at Innovative Firms*
Kline, P., Petkova, N., Williams, H., & Zidar, O. (2019) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz011 · Cited by 384
Imperfect Competition in the Labor Market
Alan, M. (2011) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02409-9 · Cited by 329
Household Debt Overhang and Unemployment
DONALDSON, J. R., PIACENTINO, G., & THAKOR, A. (2019) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12760 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1339-1369
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119374980
- Cited by
- 792
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 139.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
