Cited by 1,439Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityEconomic theories and modelsMonetary Policy and Economic Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Employment Fluctuations with Equilibrium Wage Stickiness

Hall, Robert E·2005·American Economic Review

Abstract

Following a recession, the aggregate labor market is slack–employment remains below normal and recruiting efforts of employers, as measured by help-wanted advertising and vacancies, are low. A model of matching friction explains the qualitative responses of the labor market to adverse shocks, but requires implausibly large shocks to account for the magnitude of observed fluctuations. The incorporation of wage stickiness vastly increases the sensitivity of the model to driving forces. I develop a new model of the way that wage stickiness affects unemployment. The stickiness arises in an economic equilibrium and satisfies the condition that no worker-employer pair has an unexploited opportunity for mutual improvement. Sticky wages neither interfere with the efficient formation of employment matches nor cause inefficient job loss. Thus the model provides an answer to the fundamental criticism previously directed at sticky-wage models of fluctuations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/0002828053828482

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1086/261387 · DOI
  2. 10.2307/2534646 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0304-3932(77)90024-1 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2534505 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1287/opre.31.5.835 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/261099 · DOI
  8. Friedman Milton, 1968, American Economic Review, 58, 1
  9. Hall Robert E, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005
  10. 10.2307/135317 · DOI
  11. Malcomson James M, 1999, New York: North-Holland, 2291
  12. Mortensen Dale T, 1982, American Economic Review, 72, 968
  13. 10.1016/0022-0531(83)90048-0 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/1906951 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/2552025 · DOI
  16. Pissarides Christopher A, 1985, American Economic Review, 75, 676
  17. 10.1111/0034-6527.00281 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/1912531 · DOI
  19. 10.1257/0002828053828572 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/2297404 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,439

Metadata

Authors
Hall, R. E.
Affiliations
Hoover Institution (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Robert E
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
50-65
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051133393
Cited by
1,439
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 92
FWCI
177.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Keywords
wage rigidity, employment fluctuations, matching frictions, unemployment, job vacancies, economic recession, labor market slack, job loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Employment Fluctuations with Equilibrium Wage Stickiness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/0002828053828482
The paper
Hall, R. E. (2005). Employment Fluctuations with Equilibrium Wage Stickiness. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828482