Cited by 131Corporate Management and LeadershipOrganizational Learning and LeadershipEducation, Management, Technology, Human Resources

Learning & Development in Times of Digital Transformation: Facilitating a Culture of Change and Innovation

Open access
Vey, Karin, Fandel-Meyer, Tanja, Zipp, Jan S., Schneider, Christian·2017·International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC)

Abstract

The digital transformation is the very heart of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which is about to change our understanding of doing business, of learning & development in a fundamental way – and with unrivaled speed. However, many companies and individuals hesitate to acknowledge the depth and impact of current developments. We suggest to distinguish four reasons: the striking impact of advanced digitization is not yet fully recognized (1); there is a lack of imagination and strategy, coupled with increasing unpredictability (2); a lack of agility and insufficient encouragement towards innovation (3); and a lack of pertinent competencies and insufficient innovation culture (4). New roles and action areas for Learning & Development (L&D) professionals enable possibilities to overcome these innovation barriers: change agent & consultant; designer of an enriched learning portfolio of products and services; shaper of innovation culture. Also facilitating a learning friendly culture by using different pillars is a way to generate innovation and to secure the existence of organizations in times of digital transformation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3991/ijac.v10i1.6334

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SMEs that succeed in DT display strong commitment from top management, an articulated digital vision, and sustained investment in workforce upskilling.

    “SMEs that succeed in DT display strong commitment from the top of the management structure, an articulated digital vision, and sustained investment in workforce upskilling (Sebastian et al., 2017;Vey et al., 2017).”

    From Digital transformation: a comparative analysis of SME digital maturity models (2025) · cites this paper as Vey et al., 2017

    Section 1.5 says a clear vision and competent leaders and employees matter for digital transformation; the L&D discussion recommends developing those competencies. Sections 1.1 and 1.6 also discuss board-level attention and the need for an explicit mission. The paper does not specifically study successful SMEs or establish that they display sustained investment in workforce upskilling. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

24 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. N. Bennett and G. J. Lemoine, "What VUCA Really Means for You," Harvard Business Review, vol. 92, no. 1,2, p. 27, 2014.
  2. J. P. Kotter, "Accelerate!: How the most Innovative Companies Capitalize on Today's Rapid-fire Strategic -and Still Make Their Numbers," Harvard Business Review, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 44-58, 2012.
  3. B. Robertson, "Organization at the Leading Edge: Introducing Holacracy™ Evolving Or- ganization," Integral Leadership Review, vol. 7, no. 2, 2007.
  4. J. P. Kotter and J. Wasserman, "Viele Organisationen stehen sich selbst im Weg: Interview von Cliff Lehnen," Personalwirtschaft, no. 2, pp. 36-38, 2016.
  5. F. Kalman, "Corporate Classrooms: Adapting to Change," Chief Learning Officer, no. 10, pp. 38-48, 2013.
  6. B. Wördenweber, M. Eggert, and M. Schmitt, Verhaltensorientiertes Innovationsmanage- ment: Unternehmerisches Potenzial aktivieren. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23255-8 · DOI
  7. J. Rao and J. Weintraub, "How Innovative Is Your Companys Culture?," MIT Sloan Man- agement Review, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 29-37, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vey, K., Fandel-Meyer, T., Zipp, J. S., & Schneider, C.
Affiliations
  • IBM Research - Zurich (CH)
  • University of St.Gallen (CH)
  • Zeppelin Universität gemeinnützige GmbH (DE)
Venue
International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC)
Published
2017-03-30
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
22
ISSN
1867-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2562535454
Cited by
131
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Education, Management, Technology, Human Resources
Keywords
digital transformation, learning and development, innovation culture, organizational change, Fourth Industrial Revolution, barriers to innovation, agility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review