The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Generative AI Influences Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Critical Thinking Skills? A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly tools such as ChatGPT, is transforming education by enhancing self-regulated learning (SRL) and critical thinking skills, two essential competencies in the digital era. This study systematically analyzes the impact of generative AI on these skills using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework to identify, evaluate, and synthesize relevant studies. Document searches were conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, focusing on publications from 2022 to 2024, when ChatGPT was first widely adopted. Of the 3,214 documents identified, 557 met the initial screening criteria, and 38 studies were selected for detailed analysis. The findings reveal that 71.4% of studies reported AI’s positive role in SRL, mainly through personalized learning, metacognitive support, and adaptive feedback. Likewise, 62.5% of studies reported its significant role in critical thinking, supporting the process of analysis, evaluation, and reflection. However, researchers cautioned against an overreliance on technology, which one said could take away some students’ ability to think for themselves. Such findings indicate that educational institutions need to change their ways and include generative AI in a model that focuses on areas that foster learner independence. This approach will assist teachers and decision-makers in harnessing the distinctive kitsch of AI technology by creating new learning spaces that are creative and future-oriented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“it primarily treated CT as a secondary outcome linked to SRL metrics.”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A methodological limitation of this review is its reliance on only three databases, which increases the risk of omitting relevant studies from broader interdisciplinary venues such as ERIC, PsycINFO, or IEEE Xplore.”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“but stopped short of embedding these insights within an established CT theory.”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“They noted persistent risks of overreliance on AI, cultural and digital-literacy variability, and the absence of concrete models for integrating human and AI regulation”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, their search strategy, although transparent, relied on generic terms such as”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The medical education literature describes substantial potential benefits from GenAI, including 24/7 tutoring, personalised feedback, test generation, writing assistance, and support for self-regulated learning (Mulaudzi & Hamilton, 2025; Sardi et al., 2025).”
From Between Co-Intelligence and Cognitive Offloading: Educators’ Perspectives from Dutch Academic Medical Settings on Generative AI, Critical Thinking, and Adult Professional Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Sardi et al., 2025
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While their synthesis detailed GenAI's role in scaffolding metacognitive strategies and providing adaptive feedback”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Sardi et al. [40] explored both self-regulated learning (SRL) and CT across thirty-eight studies sourced from Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect spanning 2022-2024.”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A few reviews have focused on CT as a primary outcome [19,40].”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Both reviews offer valuable insights into GenAI's pedagogical affordances and challenges; however, neither systematically applies a robust CT theoretical lens to drive analysis.”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Reviews also identify situations in which GenAI supports reflective feedback, self-regulation, and analytical activity (Sardi et al., 2025).”
From Between Co-Intelligence and Cognitive Offloading: Educators’ Perspectives from Dutch Academic Medical Settings on Generative AI, Critical Thinking, and Adult Professional Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Sardi et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: ChatGPT in the classroom: navigating the generative AI wave in management education
Leelavathi, R., & Surendhranatha, R. C. (2024) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-01-2024-0017 · Cited by 54
RetractedZhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7 · Cited by 1,567
Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13090856 · Cited by 877
Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13454 · Cited by 591
Jin, S.-H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5 · Cited by 522
Darwin, D., Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki, M. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2290342 · Cited by 494
Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0 · Cited by 475
Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., & Kim, J. H. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0 · Cited by 409
van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13100998 · Cited by 401
Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395 · Cited by 387
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Izquierdo-Condoy, J. S., Arias-Intriago, M., Tello-De-la-Torre, A., Busch, F., & Ortiz-Prado, E. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/76340 · Cited by 87
Liu, J., Sihes, A. J. B., & Lu, Y. (2025) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0 · Cited by 52
Xia, Q., Liu, Q., Tlili, A., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105465 · Cited by 77
Zhao, G., Sheng, H., Wang, Y., Cai, X., & Long, T. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15050554 · Cited by 58
Helal, M. Y. I., Elgendy, I. A., Albashrawi, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Al-Ahmadi, S., & Jeon, I. (2025) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-05-2025-0125 · Cited by 61
Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Wei, L., Wang, Q., Niu, P., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105473 · Cited by 40
Enhancing critical thinking skills in ChatGPT-human interaction: a scoping review
Raitskaya, L., & Tikhonova, E. (2025) · Journal of Language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2025.27387 · Cited by 30
Al‐Fattal, A. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/02734753251356691 · Cited by 28
Galindo‐Domínguez, H., Delgado, N., de la Maza, M. S., & Urbieta, J. M. E. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2026.108985 · Cited by 21
ChatGPT as a Digital Tool in the Transformation of Digital Teaching Competence: A Systematic Review
Cerero, J. F., Rueda, M. M., Graván, P. R., & Fernández‐Batanero, J. M. (2025) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies13050205 · Cited by 25
Leveraging ChatGPT to Support Self-Regulated Learning in Online Courses
Zhu, M. (2025) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-025-01075-z · Cited by 23
Hershkovitz, A., Tabach, M., Reich, Y., Lurie, L., & Cholcman, T. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13070518 · Cited by 26
Balart, T., Díaz, B., & Shryock, K. (2026) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a19030179 · Cited by 29
“Similarly, Sardi et al. [40] explored both self-regulated learning (SRL) and CT across thirty-eight studies sourced from Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect spanning 2022–2024.”
Mirea, C.-M., Bologa, R., Toma, A., Clim, A., Plăcintă, D.-D., & Bobocea, A. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15105785 · Cited by 31
Erosion of Critical Academic Skills Due to AI Dependency Among Tertiary Students
Miranda, J. P. P., Cruz, M. A. D., Fernandez, A. B., Balahadia, F. F., Aviles, J. S., Caro, C. A., Liwanag, I. G., & Gaña, E. P. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0122-8.ch002 · Cited by 19
Alubthane, F. O. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1863931 · Cited by 12
Exploring the Impact of AI on Critical Thinking Development in ESL: A Systematic Literature Review
Zakaria, N. Y. K., Hashim, H. B., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2025) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.24093/awej/ai.19 · Cited by 12
Wang, T., Li, S., Li, S., Zhang, J., & Gao, J. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70059 · Cited by 13
Developing self-regulated artificial intelligence learning (SRAIL) Student Attitudes Scale
Mazı, A., & Mazı, A. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105227 · Cited by 14
Levy‐Nadav, L., Shamir‐Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70123 · Cited by 15
Ganguly, A., Mehjabin, N., Malik, A. N., & Johri, A. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00916-0 · Cited by 19
ChatGPT in education: A systematic review of its impact on critical thinking skills and dispositions
Guo, Y., Huang, L., Zhang, C., Li, Q., & Chen, M. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102106 · Cited by 18
Yilmaz, M., Gauthier, A., & Cukurova, M. (2026) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-026-10595-1 · Cited by 9
“To address this limitation, the present study adopts a theory-based framework (please see Table 1 for details) proposed by Ye and Pennisi (2022), specifically tailored to SRL.”
Gu, J., Chen, J., & Yan, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1736446 · Cited by 15
Empowering Students' Autonomy in EFL Learning: AI Innovations in Schools of the Global South
Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2025) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/isd2.70041 · Cited by 18
Harrasi, N. A., Subhi, N. A., Harthy, S. A., & Habsi, J. A. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101950 · Cited by 16
Students’ Statistical Thinking When Using Generative AI: A Descriptive Case Study
Rao, V. N. V., Jeng, A., Drew, J., Kala, B., & Gongati, S. (2025) · Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education · doi:10.1080/26939169.2025.2596684 · Cited by 6
Bećirović, S., Augustín, M., Mattoš, B., & Dančo, J. (2026) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-026-10042-y · Cited by 7
Reimagining critical thinking in the age of AI: implications for nursing education and practice
Hoffarth, M. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107076 · Cited by 5
The Impact of AI Tools on EFL Students’ Self-Efficacy in Academic Writing: A Qualitative Study
Erliani, N. N. P., Eryansyah, E., & Amrullah, A. (2025) · Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran · doi:10.19109/s75mbm13 · Cited by 6
Using GenAI for Socratic Questioning: An Approach to Higher‐Order Thinking for Nursing Education
Chan, H. M., & Ho, K. H. M. (2025) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.70355 · Cited by 5
Chang, L., Hung, L.-L., Liu, T. Z., Huang, C., Lin, H., & Liao, L. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-04069-7 · Cited by 7
Flipped design thinking with generative AI for digital literacy in ODL
Suwardika, G., Sopandi, A. T., Indrawan, I. P. O., & Masakazu, K. (2026) · Asian Association of Open Universities Journal · doi:10.1108/aaouj-11-2025-0206 · Cited by 3
Wang, M., Zhang, S., Huang, M., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1637026 · Cited by 4
Zarandi, F. M., Martin, M., Wei, S., & Reeping, D. P. (2025) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie63693.2025.11328196 · Cited by 3
Cheng, M., & Cheung, K. K. C. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2609793 · Cited by 5
Nguyen, H., Chen, H., & Asfani, K. (2026) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331261450647 · Cited by 8
Fritzsche, A. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03143-1 · Cited by 3
Candel, E. C., Pérez, A. L., Berd-Gómez, R., & González-Martín, A. M. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2641323 · Cited by 8
Wu, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1803799 · Cited by 2
Sultana, N., Haque, A., & Rupa, R. A. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01469-9 · Cited by 2
ChatGPT in Dental Education: A Dual-Method Analysis of Technology Acceptance and Predictive Modeling
Samala, A. D., Fiandra, Y. A., Zahara, O., Ferdian, F., Mardiah, A., Cabanillas-García, J. L., Feng, X., & Arcelus-Ulibarrena, J. M. (2025) · Seminars in Medical Writing and Education · doi:10.56294/mw2025826 · Cited by 1
Liyanawatta, M., Yang, S., Cai, M.-Y., Yu, S.-Y., Wang, J., Chang, C.-K., & Chen, G. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13806-z · Cited by 1
Nurhayati, S., Lotfi, F. Z., Taufikin, T., & Hidayat, A. W. (2025) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05306-0_1 · Cited by 3
Avaliação da Aprendizagem em Programação com IA Generativa na Educação Profissional e Tecnológica
Gomes, P. C. R., & Hübner, J. F. (2025) · Anais do ... Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação/Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação · doi:10.5753/sbie.2025.12395 · Cited by 1
Self-Regulated Language Learning and Generative AI: A Systematic Review
Özturan, T. (2025) · Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.52597/buje.1751534 · Cited by 7
Kampylis, P. (2025) · Cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05817-1_1 · Cited by 1
Laksanasut, S. (2026) · International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews · doi:10.60027/ijsasr.2026.10022 · Cited by 1
Academic competence as a predictor of nursing students' readiness for artificial intelligence
Eltantawy, E. (2026) · International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences · doi:10.21833/ijaas.2026.02.002 · Cited by 1
P, K. P. K. (2026) · Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education · doi:10.30935/conmaths/17894 · Cited by 1
University Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools Beyond Text Generation
Marchetti, E., Frandsen, T. F., & Sandu, D.-A. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13153-9_4 · Cited by 1
Jiang, Y., Feng, X., Liu, Y., Liu, B., & Bao, L. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2691907 · Cited by 1
Zhang, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1784354 · Cited by 4
How Metacognition Shapes Higher Education Adoption of LLMs: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Pinto, P. H. R., de Araujo, V. M. U., & Lopez, L. C. S. (2025) · Anais do Workshop sobre as Implicações da Computação na Sociedade (WICS) · doi:10.5753/wics.2025.8977 · Cited by 1
Younas, M. S., Teo, T. P., Bozkurt, A., & Xiong, M. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70867 · Cited by 1
Bruijn, K., & Vlachopoulos, D. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16091470
Louatouate, H., Zeriouh, M., & Farahi, A. (2025) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98476-1_3
Senior High School Students’ Behavioral Intent, Usage, and Misuse of Generative AI in Learning
Tutor, B. O. D., Bernardo, L. M. A., Tadique, J. M. V., Pontanar, M. C. T., Pangilinan, J. B., & Butial, R. M. (2025) · International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL) · doi:10.1109/icdel65868.2025.11193475
Educación Mediática Crítica con y en Inteligencia Artificial Generativa
Santoveña, I. P., & Murias, T. F. (2025) · VISUAL REVIEW International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual · doi:10.62161/revvisual.v17.5948
Setiawati, I., Mulyono, H., & Nur, A. H. B. (2025) · Multidisciplinary Reviews · doi:10.31893/multirev.2026240 · Cited by 1
A Meta-Model Analysis of Students’ Autonomous Interaction With General-Purpose LLMs
Cloux, M., Monticolo, D., & Bary, R. (2025) · International Generative AI and Computational Language Modelling Conference (GACLM) · doi:10.1109/gaclm67198.2025.11232237
Paiva, S. R., Costa, A. P., Reis, L. P., Lourenço, F. R., & Juste, M. R. P. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02999-7_6
Agsalog, A. J. D., Bulado, N. M. F., Yatan, T. Z. Q., Rivas, B. L., Monoy, M. T., & Sebote, A. Q. (2025) · International Conference on Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1109/icet67421.2025.11380572
Leng, J., Li, Y., Qian, J., Dai, L., & King, R. B. (2026) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-026-01086-1
The Impact of Generative AI Usage on Indonesian Higher Education Students
Benaya, T., Sebastian, A., Jessika, N., & Sudiana (2025) · International Conference of Science and Information Technology in Smart Administration (ICSINTESA) · doi:10.1109/icsintesa68165.2025.11413676
Sepúlveda-Villegas, M., Jiménez-Pérez, M. I., Sánchez-López, A. L., del Campo, K. N. R.-M., Sanchez‐Ante, G., & Navarro-López, D. E. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Education (ICAITE) · doi:10.1109/icaite68636.2025.11442596
Afdi, M. P. F., & Pangestu, H. (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS) · doi:10.1109/iciss67859.2026.11454066
Gunathilake, N., Gamage, A., Rajapakshe, D. D. S., Jayasooriya, M. N. N. J., Wisenthige, K., & Yapa, C. G. (2026) · International Conference on Advanced Research in Computing (ICARC) · doi:10.1109/icarc68737.2026.11453820
Generative AI and adaptive systems for customising help-seeking scaffolds: A systematic review
Jecha, J., Igweani, C. C., Banaras, A., Liang, Y., & Mwalyego, F. M. (2026) · Information Services & Use · doi:10.1177/18758789261486037
Jecha, J., Liang, Y., Han, J., & Nassor, H. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9461812/v1 · Cited by 1
Ratniyom, J., Boonphadung, S., Intaraprasit, M., & Chumkaeo, P. (2026) · Chemistry Teacher International · doi:10.1515/cti-2025-0097 · Cited by 2
The Impact of Generative AI Interaction on Human Metacognition and Critical Thinking
Galib, A. A., Uddowla, M. A., Islam, M. A., Abbas, J., Bashir, A., & Seyam, R. (2025) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit68739.2025.11491521
Guansing, J., Leoveras, M. E. D. C., & Natividad, L. R. (2026) · Multidisciplinary Reviews · doi:10.31893/multirev.2026525
Neto, R., Saúde, I., & Araújo, J. L. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18030-8_9
Artificial Intelligence Chatbot‐Empowered Critical Thinking: Voices From English Majors
Liang, W., & Li, L. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70258
Transforming STEM Education with AI: Potential and Pitfalls
Tunga, Y., & Çağıltay, K. (2026) · Springer texts in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18806-9_9
Zheng, W., Ratanaolarn, T., & Sriwisathiyakun, K. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2676265 · Cited by 1
Anshary, M. R., & Ayriza, Y. (2026) · Counsenesia Indonesian Journal Of Guidance and Counseling · doi:10.36728/cijgc.v7i1.6496
Lım, W. (2026) · Journal of Musculoskeletal Science and Technology · doi:10.29273/jmst.2026.10.1.43
Putri, H., & Novaliyosi, N. (2026) · Kognitif Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika · doi:10.51574/kognitif.v6i2.5028
Dubbing artificial intelligence in scaffolding
Shuib, A., Mahzan, S. K., & Yaacob, A. (2026) · Journal of International Students · doi:10.32674/2vs8yp30
Your brain on ChatGPT, but whose brain? The missing adolescent in AI-cognition research
Campos, J. P., & Koff, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Developmental Psychology · doi:10.3389/fdpys.2026.1885225
Zhen, X., & Lian, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1845571 · Cited by 1
Terceirização cognitiva e pensamento crítico
Ribeiro, K. R., & de Matos, M. A. E. (2026) · Revista Sítio Novo · doi:10.47236/2594-7036.2026.v10.2239 · Cited by 1
Chan, H. M., Yousef, K. M., Alananzeh, I. M., & Hatahet, S. (2026) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep16100352
AI Over-Reliance and Cognitive Decline: Evidence from Higher Education Students
Noorbehbahani, F., & Oyibo, K. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-33957-7_33
Fang, X., Yang, Z., Niu, J., & Mazhar, B. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14113-x
Fissore, C., Floris, F., & Marchisio, M. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31853-4_7
Microlearning Loops in Software Engineering Syllabi: An Exploratory Qualitative Case Study
Sadri, A. M., Mungiria, H., Kittur, J., & Abdulhak, M. (2026) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--60167
Eyal, L., & Kololshi-Minsker, I. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1895481
Adeniranye, D. I., Brijmohan, Y., Jacobs, M., Laghari, A. W. K., & Osunbunmi, I. S. (2026) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--61157
Tran‐Duong, Q. H. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14120-y
Integration of Digital Qur'Anic Learning in Islamic Religious Education Learning
Khoiri, A., Mahardini, A. P., Romadona, S., & Haidar, R. (2026) · JUDIKDAS Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia · doi:10.51574/judikdas.v5i2.5693
A scoping review of the negative effects of digital technology on cognition
Žnidarič, U., Štrumbelj, E., & Machidon, O. M. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101326 · Cited by 5
Marneri, E., Tzimas, D. E., Karamerou, V., & Vergados, D. J. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15090635
AI-Powered Digital Escape Rooms for Educational Leadership & Management: A PRISMA Review
Drongiti, E., Kalogeratos, G., Alexandropoulou, A., & Πιερρακέας, Χ. (2026) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa71656.2026.11705454
NEFAYAZ, A. (2026) · Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.65083/asbider.1949649
Winter, E. L., Dale, B. A., Larsen, C., Bray, C., Courville, T., & Kaufman, A. S. (2026) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2026.102071
The impact of artificial intelligence on students’ metacognition: a systematic review
Ji, C., & Tan, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1947198
Metadata
- Authors
- Sardi, J., Darmansyah, Candra, O., Yuliana, D. F., Habibullah, Yanto, D. T. P., & Eliza, F.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Negeri Padang (ID)
- Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci (ID)
- Venue
- International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)
- Published
- 2025-01-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-108
- ISSN
- 2192-4880 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4406246343
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 44
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Universitas Negeri Padang
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- generative AI in education, ChatGPT, student self-regulation, critical thinking skills, personalized learning, metacognitive support, adaptive feedback, overreliance on AI, learner autonomy, AI-assisted learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
