The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agile Software Development: Methodologies and Trends
Open accessAbstract
Software engineering is a discipline that undergone many improvements that aims to keep up with the new advancements in technologies and the modern business requirements through developing effective approaches to reach the final software product, agile software development is one of these successful approaches. Agile software development is a lightweight approach that was proposed to overcome the convolutional development methods’ limitations and to reduce the overhead and the cost while providing flexibility to adopt the changes in requirements at any stage, this is done by managing the tasks and their coordination through a certain set of values and principles. In this work, a comprehensive review that outlines the main agile values and principles, and states the key differences that distinguish agile methods over the traditional ones are presented. Then a discussion of the most popular agile methodologies; their life cycles, their roles, and their advantages and disadvantages are outlined. The recent state of art trends that adopts agile development especially in cloud computing, big data, and coordination are also explored. And finally, this work highlights how to choose the best suitable agile methodology that must be selected according to the task at hand, how sensitive the product is and the organization structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Software engineering: A practitioner's approach
(1983) · Advances in Engineering Software (1978) · doi:10.1016/0141-1195(83)90118-3 · Cited by 8,234
Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change
Beck, K. L., & Andres, C. (2000) · Cited by 5,902
Agile Software Development with SCRUM
Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2001) · Cited by 2,656
Sagiroglu, S., & Sinanc, D. (2013) · 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS) · doi:10.1109/cts.2013.6567202 · Cited by 1,296
Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis
Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J. K., & Warsta, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.08439 · Cited by 1,180
IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology
(2008) · doi:10.1109/ieeestd.1990.101064 · Cited by 979
Conboy, K. (2009) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1090.0236 · Cited by 823
A review and future direction of agile, business intelligence, analytics and data science
Larson, D., & Chang, V. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.013 · Cited by 427
Jeffries, R., Anderson, A., & Hendrickson, C. (2000) · Cited by 416
(2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87054-5 · Cited by 332
Cited by
He, J., Treude, C., & Lo, D. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3712003 · Cited by 246
LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision and the Road Ahead
He, J., Treude, C., & Lo, D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.04834 · Cited by 246
Enhancing DevSecOps practice with Large Language Models and Security Chaos Engineering
Bedoya, M., Palacios, S., Díaz-López, D., Laverde, E., & Nespoli, P. (2024) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-024-00909-w · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Alsaqqa, S., Sawalha, S., & Abdel-Nabi, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM)
- Published
- 2020-07-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 246
- ISSN
- 1865-7923 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3041586137
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 35.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agile Software Development: Methodologies and Trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269
- The paper
- Alsaqqa, S., Sawalha, S., & Abdel-Nabi, H. (2020). Agile Software Development: Methodologies and Trends. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.