Cited by 427Big Data and Business IntelligenceSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

A review and future direction of agile, business intelligence, analytics and data science

Open access
Larson, Deanne, Chang, Victor·2016·International Journal of Information Management

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.013

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prescriptive analytics has been increasingly gathering research interest.

    “Nevertheless, prescriptive analytics, which seeks to find the best course of action for the future, has been increasingly gathering the research interest.”

    From Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges (2020) · cites this paper as Larson & Chang, 2016

    The Analytics section says prescriptive analytics began to emerge and that organizations are focusing more on it. This supports growing interest in the field, but the passages describe organizational attention, not an increase in research interest specifically. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although there have been many descriptive and predictive algorithms utilizing data mining, machine learning and artificial intelligence, prescriptive analytics has not gathered the same attention yet.

    “Although there have been a lot of descriptive and predictive algorithms utilizing data mining, machine learning and artificial intelligence (Larson & Chang, 2016;Tsai et al., 2015), prescriptive analytics has not gathered the same attention yet.”

    From Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges (2020) · cites this paper as Larson & Chang, 2016

    The Analytics section (page unavailable) says descriptive analysis was prominent while predictive and prescriptive analytics were emerging, which supports the broad comparison. The Model/Design/Development section (page unavailable) links descriptive and predictive analysis to machine-learning algorithms. Our copy does not establish that many such algorithms use artificial intelligence, and it also says organizations are increasingly focusing on prescriptive analysis. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [5]5. Chan, F., & Thong, J. (2009). Acceptance of agile methodologies: A critical review and conceptual framework. Decision Support Systems (46), 803-814.
  2. [12]12. Couture, N. (2013). Best Practices for Adopting Agile Methodologies for Data Warehouse Development. Business Intelligence Journal, 18(2), 8-17.
  3. [13]13. Cockburn, A. (2008). Using Both Incremental and Iterative Development. The Journal of Defense Software Engineering. May.
  4. [15]15. Davenport, T. H. (2013). Analytics 3.0. Harvard Business Review, 91(12), 64-72.
  5. [26]26. Jarr, S. (2015). Fast Data and the New Enterprise Data Architecture. O'Reilly Publishing.
  6. [27]27. Larson, D. (2009). BI Principles for Agile Development: Keeping Focused. Business Intelligence Journal, 14(4), 36-41. Retrieved from Business Source Complete database
  7. [30]30. Mungree, D.; Rudra, A.; Morien, D. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, August 15-17, 2013.
  8. [37]37. Yeoh, W., & Koronios, A. (2010). CRITICAL SUCCES FACTORS FOR BUSINESS INTELIGENCE SYSTEMS. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(3), 23-32. Retrieved from Business Source Complete database ADDITIONAL READING SECTION
  9. [39]39. Chan, F., & Thong, J. (2009). Acceptance of agile methodologies: A critical review and conceptual framework. Decision Support Systems (46), 803-814.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larson, D., & Chang, V.
Affiliations
Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chang, Victor
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
700-710
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2340139852
Cited by
427
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
77.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
agile methods, business intelligence, data analytics, data science, big data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review