Cited by 12Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Building Design and AssessmentSustainable Supply Chain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Demolition Contractors' Perceptions of Impediments to Salvage and Reuse of Wood Structural Components

Open access
Shaurette, Mark·2006·Journal of Green Building

Abstract

The study was conducted to ascertain demolition contractors' perceptions of the primary impediments to the widespread salvage of wood structural components for reuse or recycling. Assessment of the attitudes of demolition contractors was chosen since their participation in the salvage and reuse of materials is a key component necessary for any program to reduce the waste disposal rate of demolition debris. The insights obtained from the study can be used to facilitate future planning and design of programs and research that advance the recycling of demolition debris. A sample of contractor members of the National Demolition Association was surveyed for the study. In addition to demolition contractors' perception of impediments to salvage of wood structural components, the survey instrument provided a significant volume of descriptive information about demolition companies operating in the continental United States.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3992/jgb.1.2.145

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Environmental policies and green building rating systems such as BREEAM and LEED have a positive impact on reuse rates.

    “The environmental policies (Chileshe et al., 2018) and green building rating systems such as Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) are reported to have a positive impact on reuse rates (Shaurette, 2006; Gorgolewski, 2008).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006

    The Conclusions say that promoting reused materials through green certification programs such as LEED will help develop markets for salvaged materials. They do not discuss BREEAM or report that rating systems increased reuse rates. The sentence cites a different source for environmental policies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Informality and good relationships among stakeholders help overcome the trust challenge and promote reuse.

    “However, according to a few articles, informality and good relationships among the stakeholders are reported to help overcome this challenge and promote reuse (Chileshe et al., 2016b; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Shaurette, 2006).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006

    The Written Responses section (page unavailable) says that maintaining a relationship with a buyer benefits wood salvage, supporting the relationship-and-reuse part of the claim. It does not say that informality or good relationships among stakeholders overcome a trust challenge. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Perceptions of clients, contractors and designers have a higher impact on successful integration of recovered components into a new building.

    “Among the stakeholders, the perceptions of clients (Chileshe et al., 2015; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Dunant et al., 2017; Rose and Stegemann, 2018), contractors (Gorgolewski, 2008; Shaurette, 2006) and designers (Gorgolewski, 2008) have a higher impact on the successful integration of recovered components into a new building.”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006

    Shaurette is cited for the contractors portion of the sentence. The Purpose of the Study and Abstract (page not supplied) say demolition contractors’ participation is necessary for successful salvage and reuse programs, and the Conclusions link their perceptions to reuse decisions. The paper does not establish that those perceptions have a higher impact than other factors on integrating recovered components into a new building. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lack of skills, experience, and knowledge in deconstruction, salvage and using reused components negatively affects reuse of building components.

    “According to the literature, the lack of skills, experience, and knowledge in deconstruction, salvage and using reused components negatively affect the reuse of the building components (Chileshe et al., 2015, 2016b; Gorgolewski, 2008, Shaurette, 2006, Yeung et al., 2015).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006

    The Introduction (page not provided) identifies limited knowledge as a barrier to deconstruction and recycling. The Conclusions (page not provided) suggest that operator training could advance structural-wood salvage and reuse. The paper does not establish lack of skills or experience as impediments, or address knowledge of using reused components specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lack of procedures to evaluate and guarantee performance of reused components, and existing codes, standards and procedures not considering BCR, further decrease the reuse rate in construction.

    “Therefore, the lack of procedures to evaluate and guarantee the performance of reused components (Shaurette, 2006, Tingley et al., 2017), and the fact that the existing codes, standards and procedures do not consider BCR (Gorgolewski, 2008; Huuhka and Hakanen, 2015; Rameezdeen et al., 2016; Tingley et al., 2017), further decrease the reuse rate in construction.”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says salvaged lumber quality is difficult to judge and existing grading rules do not specifically address it. The Conclusions call for easier condition-assessment procedures for structural wood, but do not establish a lack of procedures to guarantee performance for reused components generally. Shaurette is cited for the first clause, not the separate claim about codes and BCR. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. The Fort Ord Experience. Fort Ord Reuse Authority PowerPoint presented at the 2003 Rinker International Conference on Deconstruction and Materials Reuse. Retrieved
  2. Occupational Safety and Heath Administration Jacksonville Florida Area Office PowerPoint presented at the 2003 Rinker International Conference on Deconstruction and Materials Reuse. Retrieved
  3. Selection of Methods for the Reduction, Reuse, and Recycling of Demolition Waste. (Technical Bulletin 420-49-32)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review

    Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x20910463 · Cited by 167

    “…the increased labour cost (Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016; Dantata et al., 2005; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Klang et al., 2003; Rameezdeen et al., 2016; Shaurette, 2006 (among others)), transportation cost (da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Gorgolewski, 2008; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Pongiglione and…”
    BackgroundInfluential

Metadata

Authors
Shaurette, M.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Shaurette, Mark
Venue
Journal of Green Building
Published
2006
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
145-163
ISSN
  • 1552-6100 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4618
OpenAlex
W2010139699
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Green Building (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Purdue University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
demolition contractors, construction and demolition waste, contractor perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review