The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Demolition Contractors' Perceptions of Impediments to Salvage and Reuse of Wood Structural Components
Open accessAbstract
The study was conducted to ascertain demolition contractors' perceptions of the primary impediments to the widespread salvage of wood structural components for reuse or recycling. Assessment of the attitudes of demolition contractors was chosen since their participation in the salvage and reuse of materials is a key component necessary for any program to reduce the waste disposal rate of demolition debris. The insights obtained from the study can be used to facilitate future planning and design of programs and research that advance the recycling of demolition debris. A sample of contractor members of the National Demolition Association was surveyed for the study. In addition to demolition contractors' perception of impediments to salvage of wood structural components, the survey instrument provided a significant volume of descriptive information about demolition companies operating in the continental United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Environmental policies and green building rating systems such as BREEAM and LEED have a positive impact on reuse rates.
“The environmental policies (Chileshe et al., 2018) and green building rating systems such as Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) are reported to have a positive impact on reuse rates (Shaurette, 2006; Gorgolewski, 2008).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006
The Conclusions say that promoting reused materials through green certification programs such as LEED will help develop markets for salvaged materials. They do not discuss BREEAM or report that rating systems increased reuse rates. The sentence cites a different source for environmental policies. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInformality and good relationships among stakeholders help overcome the trust challenge and promote reuse.
“However, according to a few articles, informality and good relationships among the stakeholders are reported to help overcome this challenge and promote reuse (Chileshe et al., 2016b; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Shaurette, 2006).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006
The Written Responses section (page unavailable) says that maintaining a relationship with a buyer benefits wood salvage, supporting the relationship-and-reuse part of the claim. It does not say that informality or good relationships among stakeholders overcome a trust challenge. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPerceptions of clients, contractors and designers have a higher impact on successful integration of recovered components into a new building.
“Among the stakeholders, the perceptions of clients (Chileshe et al., 2015; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Dunant et al., 2017; Rose and Stegemann, 2018), contractors (Gorgolewski, 2008; Shaurette, 2006) and designers (Gorgolewski, 2008) have a higher impact on the successful integration of recovered components into a new building.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006
Shaurette is cited for the contractors portion of the sentence. The Purpose of the Study and Abstract (page not supplied) say demolition contractors’ participation is necessary for successful salvage and reuse programs, and the Conclusions link their perceptions to reuse decisions. The paper does not establish that those perceptions have a higher impact than other factors on integrating recovered components into a new building. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLack of skills, experience, and knowledge in deconstruction, salvage and using reused components negatively affects reuse of building components.
“According to the literature, the lack of skills, experience, and knowledge in deconstruction, salvage and using reused components negatively affect the reuse of the building components (Chileshe et al., 2015, 2016b; Gorgolewski, 2008, Shaurette, 2006, Yeung et al., 2015).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006
The Introduction (page not provided) identifies limited knowledge as a barrier to deconstruction and recycling. The Conclusions (page not provided) suggest that operator training could advance structural-wood salvage and reuse. The paper does not establish lack of skills or experience as impediments, or address knowledge of using reused components specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLack of procedures to evaluate and guarantee performance of reused components, and existing codes, standards and procedures not considering BCR, further decrease the reuse rate in construction.
“Therefore, the lack of procedures to evaluate and guarantee the performance of reused components (Shaurette, 2006, Tingley et al., 2017), and the fact that the existing codes, standards and procedures do not consider BCR (Gorgolewski, 2008; Huuhka and Hakanen, 2015; Rameezdeen et al., 2016; Tingley et al., 2017), further decrease the reuse rate in construction.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006
The Introduction (page unavailable) says salvaged lumber quality is difficult to judge and existing grading rules do not specifically address it. The Conclusions call for easier condition-assessment procedures for structural wood, but do not establish a lack of procedures to guarantee performance for reused components generally. Shaurette is cited for the first clause, not the separate claim about codes and BCR. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Lack of confidence in the quality of reused components negatively affects reuse in new constructions.
“Lack of confidence in the quality of the reused components negatively affects reuse in new constructions (Ajayi et al., 2015; Chileshe et al., 2015, 2016b, 2016a; Shaurette, 2006 (among others)).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006
The Introduction (page unavailable) says salvaged lumber is not easily traded because its quality is inconsistent and difficult to judge. The Conclusions (page unavailable) report that demolition contractors believe poor wood condition impedes reuse. The paper supports a quality-related barrier for salvaged wood, but does not establish the claim for reused components generally or specifically measure reuse in new construction. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTraining operators for effective deconstruction is a factor driving reuse.
“Training operators for effective deconstruction (Dantata et al., 2005; Elias Özkan, 2012; Shaurette, 2006), availability of space for the storage of the reusable components after deconstruction (Rogers, 2011) and knowledge and experience in using reused components (Tingley et al., 2017), as well as proper separation of the reusable components after deconstruction (Ajayi et al., 2017; Ding et al.,”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Shaurette, 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- The Fort Ord Experience. Fort Ord Reuse Authority PowerPoint presented at the 2003 Rinker International Conference on Deconstruction and Materials Reuse. Retrieved
- Occupational Safety and Heath Administration Jacksonville Florida Area Office PowerPoint presented at the 2003 Rinker International Conference on Deconstruction and Materials Reuse. Retrieved
- Selection of Methods for the Reduction, Reuse, and Recycling of Demolition Waste. (Technical Bulletin 420-49-32)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review
Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x20910463 · Cited by 167
“…the increased labour cost (Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016; Dantata et al., 2005; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Klang et al., 2003; Rameezdeen et al., 2016; Shaurette, 2006 (among others)), transportation cost (da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Gorgolewski, 2008; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Pongiglione and…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaurette, M.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shaurette, Mark
- Venue
- Journal of Green Building
- Publisher
- College Publishing
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-163
- ISSN
- 1552-6100 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4618
- OpenAlex
- W2010139699
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Green Building (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Purdue University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- demolition contractors, construction and demolition waste, contractor perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review