Green Site Design: Strategies for Storm Water Management
Open accessAbstract
Increasingly, proponents of green building are realizing the potential of green site development strategies on the future sustainability of urbanized areas. In particular, alternative strategies for stormwater management are being implemented and show significant promise (US EPA 2003). As the global population becomes more urban, the increase of impermeable surfaces has deleterious effects on water quality and amounts of urban runoff. Traditional approaches to development and stormwater management have resulted in stormwater systems becoming a rapid conduit for delivery of contaminated runoff to rivers and streams. Volumes have increased, concentration times reduced, and natural filtering processes have been bypassed. The result is increased flooding, polluted rivers and streams, health threats, habitat degradation, and increasing expense to maintain inadequate systems. Many municipalities and other government agencies in the US and abroad are attempting to address this issue through regulation and incentive. The United States Green Building Council LEED system recognizes and addresses this problem and the potential for more sustainable stormwater management practices. The benefits of green stormwater management strategies vary depending on the circumstances of each condition, but examples of lower cost and environmentally superior approaches are found in cities in the US and around the world. Integrating green strategies into new development projects, from planning stages through implementation, is the most cost effective and yields the most efficient and beneficial systems. Retrofitting existing stormwater management systems in cities can be more costly and provide more limited environmental benefits, but antiquation of existing systems creates opportunities to adapt and include green strategies as systems are rebuilt, updated, and improved (Kloss and Calrusse 2006). It is best to think of green stormwater management strategies holistically, allowing the most efficient opportunities for integration of techniques into the planning, design, and implementation process. These approaches are sometimes represented as green infrastructure (Dunn and Stoner 2007). They are cost effective, sustainable, and environmentally friendly. In general, green infrastructure uses natural systems to the greatest extent possible, but also uses engineered systems that mimic natural systems to collect, treat, and reduce stormwater runoff using plants, soils, and microbes. At broader scales, green infrastructure can consist of a set of connected natural and human-created open space elements that may include forests, flood plains and riparian corridors, wetlands, parks, and more. In addition to the stormwater management benefits provided, recreational activities and wildlife habitat are often accommodated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Small, low-cost, widely-distributed, parcel scale projects (i.e., 'source-control') such as vegetated swales, green streets, porous or permeable pavement, can provide stormwater control equivalent to or more effective than large centralized projects when properly sized and located.
“Small, low-cost, widely-distributed, parcel scale projects (i.e.,”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Cook 2007
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities
Rieck, L., Carson, C., Hawley, R. J., Heller, M., Paul, M., Scoggins, M., Zimmerman, M., & Smith, R. F. (2022) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-021-01179-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“…widely-distributed, parcel scale projects (i.e., “source-control”) such as vegetated swales, green streets, porous or permeable pavement, can provide stormwater control equivalent to or more effective than large centralized projects when properly sized and located (Cook 2007; Collins et al.”
Background
- Authors
- Cook, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cook, Edward A
- Venue
- Journal of Green Building
- Publisher
- College Publishing
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 46-56
- ISSN
- 1552-6100 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4618
- OpenAlex
- W2005499020
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Green Building (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
- Keywords
- stormwater management, green infrastructure, urban runoff, LEED, impervious surfaces, stormwater pollution, urban flooding, stormwater treatment, riparian corridors, wetlands, sustainable urban development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review