Cited by 14Digital Games and MediaEducational Games and GamificationEthics, Aesthetics, and Art

Play Redux: The Form of Computer Games

Open access
Myers, David·2010·University of Michigan Press eBooks

Abstract

"Play Redux excels in tying together intellectual traditions that are rooted in literary studies, cognitive science, play studies and several other fields, thereby creating a logical whole. Through this, the book makes service to several academic communities by pointing out their points of contact. This is clearly an important contribution to a growing academic field, and will no doubt become important in many future discussions about digital games and play." ---Frans Mäyrä, University of Tampere, Finland\n"David Myers has researched video games longer than anyone else. Play Redux shows him continually relevant, never afraid of courting controversy." ---Jesper Juul, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark\nPlay Redux is an ambitious description and critical analysis of the aesthetic pleasures of video game play, drawing on early twentieth-century formalist theory and models of literature. Employing a concept of biological naturalism grounded in cognitive theory, Myers argues for a clear delineation between the aesthetics of play and the aesthetics of texts. In the course of this study, Myers asks a number of interesting questions: What are the mechanics of human play as exhibited in computer games? Can these mechanisms be modeled? What is the evolutionary function of cognitive play, and is it, on the whole, a good thing? Intended as a provocative corrective to the currently ascendant, if not dominant, cultural and ethnographic approach to game studies and play, Play Redux will g…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3998/dcbooks.7933339.0001.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With digital systems, the arbiter of correct rule following is the system upholding the rules.

    “With digital systems the arbiter of correct rule following is the system upholding the rules (cf. Myers, 2010, pp. 18-19).”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Myers, 2010

  • Players may find ways of using the game in ways that the designers did not foresee.

    “However, players may find ways of using the game in ways that the designers did not foresee (Myers, 2010, pp. 1821).”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Myers, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Myers, D.
Corresponding author
Myers, David
Venue
University of Michigan Press eBooks
Published
2010
OpenAlex
W4301972111
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • University of Michigan Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Keywords
video games, play, aesthetics of play, biological naturalism, cognitive play, game mechanics, play studies, cognitive science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review