The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Exploitation
Open accessAbstract
Epistemic exploitation occurs when privileged persons compel marginalized persons to educate them about the nature of their oppression.I argue that epistemic exploitation is marked by unrecognized, uncompensated, emotionally taxing, coerced epistemic labor.The coercive and exploitative aspects of the phenomenon are exemplified by the unpaid nature of the educational labor and its associated opportunity costs, the double bind that marginalized persons must navigate when faced with the demand to educate, and the need for additional labor created by the default skepticism of the privileged.I explore the connections between epistemic exploitation and the two varieties of epistemic injustice that Fricker (2007) identifies, testimonial and hermeneutical injustice.I situate epistemic exploitation within Dotson's (2012; 2014) framework of epistemic oppression, and I address the role that epistemic exploitation plays in maintaining active ignorance and upholding dominant epistemic frameworks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Fricker, M. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 · Cited by 9,198
Racism as a stressor for African Americans: A biopsychosocial model.
Clark, R., Anderson, N. B., Clark, V. R., & Williams, D. R. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.10.805 · Cited by 2,830
Black feminist thought : knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment
Collins, P. H. (2000) · Routledge eBooks · Cited by 2,393
Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing
Dotson, K. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x · Cited by 2,150
On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life
Ahmed, S. (2012) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822395324 · Cited by 2,030
On being included: racism and diversity in institutional life
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-2895 · Cited by 1,369
Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression
Dotson, K. (2014) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2013.782585 · Cited by 1,232
A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression
Dotson, K. (2012) · Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies · doi:10.1353/fro.2012.a472779 · Cited by 874
Cited by
Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2018) · doi:10.4324/9780429492204 · Cited by 1,010
Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach
Birhane, A. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205 · Cited by 707
Epistemic Agency Under Oppression
Pohlhaus, G. (2020) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568641.2020.1780149 · Cited by 115
Spiel, K. (2021) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 · doi:10.1145/3461778.3462033 · Cited by 76
Suchanek, O., Meissner, J. L., Angelini, R., & Spiel, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713202 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Berenstain, N.
- Venue
- Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- University of Michigan Library
- Published
- 2016-11-14
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 20201214
- ISSN
- 2330-4014 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4248710612
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 18.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epistemic Exploitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.022
- The paper
- Berenstain, N. (2016). Epistemic Exploitation. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.