From Participation to Solidarity: A Case Study on Access of Maker Spaces from Deaf and Hearing Perspectives
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empowering technology at the individual level connects people to form supportive communities based on solidarity.
“Empowering technology at the individual level connects people to form supportive communities based on solidarity, as previously illustrated in the context of accessibility of maker spaces [91].”
From Rethinking “Empowering Technology” in Higher Education Accessibility: A Case Study of Disabled Students’ Experiences at a German University (2026) · cites this paper as [91]
Cites
Ladd, P. (2003) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.21832/9781853595479 · Cited by 916 · see citing works
Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design
Bennett, C. L., Brady, E., & Branham, S. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3234695.3236348 · Cited by 407 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is in line with questioning the norms behind access provision logics (cf. [97]) and acknowledging the interdependent nature of collaborative en-deavours [14].”
Anticipate and Adjust: Cultivating Access in Human-Centered Methods
Mack, K., McDonnell, E., Potluri, V., Xu, M., Zabala, J., Bigham, J., Mankoff, J., & Bennett, C. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501882 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cripping AI: Reimagining AI Through Lived Disability Experiences
Tang, X., Lin, T.-A., Li, J., & Wu, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806744 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Meiners, A.-L., Yildiz, Z., Gerling, K., Alexandrovsky, D., & Biernacka, K. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3814957
- Authors
- Suchanek, O., Meissner, J. L., Angelini, R., & Spiel, K.
- Affiliations
- TU Wien (AT)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2025-04-25
- Pages
- 1-15
- OpenAlex
- W4409736109
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- European Research Council (101117519)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- makerspaces, deaf people, hearing people, accessibility, participation, solidarity, deafness, inclusive design, co-design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
