The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Reinvention of Tradition: An Ethnographic Study of Spondylus Use in Coastal Ecuador
Abstract
Archaeologists have long noted the importance of Spondylus in the archaeological record of Ecuador. However, no one has attempted to understand contemporary Spondylus use and its relation to the precolumbian past. This research attempts to understand contemporary Spondylus use in coastal Ecuador by focusing on issues of craft production and identity formation. Using an approach that combines both archaeological and ethnographic information, this paper attempts to understand the role of Spondylus craft production in the formation of a localized identity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Por esta razón, la subsistencia de la mayoría de los habitantes de Machalilla se basa hoy en día en la pesca (Bauer, 2007).”
From La trayectoria del desarrollo social precolombino en el sur de manabí (2017) · cites this paper as Bauer, 2007
Citations
Cites
Symbolic Inversion, the Topology of El Mestizaje, and the Spaces of Las Razas in Ecuador
Whitten, N. E. (2003) · Journal of Latin American Anthropology · doi:10.1525/jlca.2003.8.1.52 · Cited by 46
Masucci, M. A. (1995) · Latin American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/971601 · Cited by 35
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trade and social complexity in coastal ecuador from formative times to European contact
Martín, A. J. (2010) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1179/009346910x12707320296676 · Cited by 11
La trayectoria del desarrollo social precolombino en el sur de manabí
Martin, A. J., & Lara, C. (2017) · Antropología Cuadernos de investigación · doi:10.26807/ant.v0i8.106
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, D. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Anthropological Research
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-50
- ISSN
- 0091-7710
- 2153-3806
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review