CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Lost World of Monticello: An Evolutionary Perspective

Neiman, Fraser D.·2008·Journal of Anthropological Research
DOI 10.3998/jar.0521004.0064.201
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This essay explores how an evolutionary perspective can help historical archaeologists use archaeological evidence to further our understanding of historical dynamics associated with the global demographic expansions of Europeans and Africans that began in the late fifteenth century. It sketches evolutionary models for some of the economic and social strategies of free and enslaved people that created a slave society in the Chesapeake region in the seventeenth century and conditioned its historical trajectory up to the Civil War. Those strategies informed the choices made by Thomas Jefferson as he developed Monticello Plantation around 1770. Evolutionary models offer tools to unravel the historical significance of subsequent change in slave and elite housing, slave settlement patterns, and agricultural ecology, documented in the archaeological record at Monticello and the region.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3998/jar.0521004.0064.201

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysts have considered the extent to which subfloor pits functioned as group or individual storage features, or in magical and religious activities, and how the conditions of enslavement shaped the usefulness of such features over time.

    “With subfloor pits, found widely under dwellings occupied by people enslaved in the Chesapeake, analysts have considered the extent to which they functioned as group or individual storage features, or in magical and religious activities, and how the conditions of enslavement, including evolving labor regimes and demographic shifts, shaped the usefulness of such features over time (Neiman 2008, Sam”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Neiman 2008

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Neiman, F. D.
Venue
Journal of Anthropological Research
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2008-07
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
161-193
ISSN
  • 0091-7710
  • 2153-3806
DOI
10.3998/jar.0521004.0064.201
Cited by
31
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review